ArticleInternal and emergency medicine2020
Cost-effectiveness analysis of different hypertension management strategies in a community setting.
Article in Internal and emergency medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.
- A WeChat-Based Self-Management Intervention for Community Middle-Aged and Elderly Adults with Hypertension in Guangzhou, China: A Cluster-Randomized Controlled Trial.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2019Trial
- "The impact of statins addind to the fixed combination antihypertensive therapy on the arterial stiffness in patients with moderate and severe hypertension".International journal of cardiology. Cardiovascular risk and prevention · 2023Article
- Cost effectiveness review of text messaging, smartphone application, and website interventions targeting T2DM or hypertension.NPJ digital medicine · 2023Review
- Mobile APP-assisted family physician program for improving blood pressure outcome in hypertensive patients.BMC primary care · 2023Article
- Cost-effectiveness analysis of different hypertension management strategies.Internal and emergency medicine · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Self-management schemes and mobile apps can be used for the management of hypertension in the community, but the most appropriate patient population is unknown. To explore whether the Chinese Health Literacy Scale (CHLSH) can be used to screen for appropriate patients with hypertension for self-management and to evaluate the clinical effectiveness and health economic evaluation of three hypertension management schemes. This was a prospective study performed from March 2017 to July 2017 in consecutive patients with primary hypertension and of 50-80 years of age from the Jinyang community, Wuhou District, Chengdu. The CHLSH was completed and the patients were classified into the high (n = 283) and low (n = 315) health literacy groups. The patients were randomly divided into the self-management, traditional management, and mobile app management groups. The high-health literacy group was selected to construct the cost-effectiveness decision tree model. Blood pressure control rate and the quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) were determined. At the end of follow-up, the success rate of self-management was 83.4%. The costs for 6 months of treatment for each patient with hypertension in the self-management, traditional management, and mobile app groups were 1266, 1751, and 1856 yuan, respectively. The costs required for obtaining 1 QALY when managing for 6 months were: 30,869 yuan for self-management; 48,628 yuan for traditional management; and 43,199 yuan for the mobile app. The CHLSH can be used as a tool for screening patients with hypertension for self-management. The cost-effectiveness of self-management was optimal.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.