Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31321689›Full record

ArticleTransgenic research2019

Potential benefits of gene editing for the future of poultry farming.

Mark L Tizard, Kristie A Jenkins, Caitlin A Cooper, Mark E Woodcock, Arjun Challagulla, Timothy J Doran

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Transgenic research, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Efficient and Safe Knockout ofVeterinary sciences · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Overview of Avian Sex Reversal.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Mark L TizardAustralian Animal Health Laboratory, CSIRO Health and Biosecurity, Geelong, VIC, Australia. Mark.Tizard@csiro.au.ORCID 0000-0001-8421-2497
Kristie A JenkinsAustralian Animal Health Laboratory, CSIRO Health and Biosecurity, Geelong, VIC, Australia.
Caitlin A CooperAustralian Animal Health Laboratory, CSIRO Health and Biosecurity, Geelong, VIC, Australia.
Mark E WoodcockAustralian Animal Health Laboratory, CSIRO Health and Biosecurity, Geelong, VIC, Australia.
Arjun ChallagullaAustralian Animal Health Laboratory, CSIRO Health and Biosecurity, Geelong, VIC, Australia.
Timothy J DoranAustralian Animal Health Laboratory, CSIRO Health and Biosecurity, Geelong, VIC, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The chicken is an exemplar of efficient intensive animal agriculture and provides two valuable food products, chicken meat and eggs. Only aquaculture is better, by efficiency, but poultry is still top, by mass of animal protein produced as food in the global context. However this efficiency and intensive production comes with a number of challenges. Though the genetics of selective breeding have led to dramatic improvements in yield, efficiency and product quality, traits that relate to disease and welfare outcomes have not been so tractable. These two issues are major impacts to the industry in terms of production and in terms of public perception. Both transgenic technology and genome editing have clear potential for impact in these two important areas. The reproductive biology of birds requires techniques very specific to birds to achieve heritable (germline) edited traits. These are quite involved and, even though they are now well-defined and reliable, there is room for improvement and advances can be expected in the future. Currently the key targets for this technology are modifying chicken genes involved in virus-receptor interactions and cellular response involved in infection. For the egg industry the technology is being applied to the issue of sex-selection for layer hens (and the removal of males), removal of allergens from egg white and the tailoring of eggs system to enhance the yield of influenza vaccine doses. Regulation and trading of the animals generated, and resulting food products, will significantly impact the value and future development of genome editing for poultry.

Indexed as

Genetic EngineeringAgricultureAnimalsBreedingChickensEgg HypersensitivityGene EditingHumansPoultrySelective BreedingCRISPRGene editingPoultryRegulation

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.