ArticleTransgenic research2019
Global developments of genome editing in agriculture.
Article in Transgenic research, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
18 citing papers in PubMed, 66 citations in OpenAlex.
- Detection method for CRISPR-Cas9 edited tomato with single nucleotide deletion using multiplex probe-based real-time PCR and confirmation of non-transgenicity: A case study.Journal, genetic engineering & biotechnology · 2025Article
- Evolution of agricultural biotechnology is the paradigm shift in crop resilience and development: a review.Frontiers in plant science · 2025Review
- CRISPR activation: identifying and using novel genes for plant disease resistance breeding.Frontiers in genome editing · 2025Review
- An overview of recent technological developments in bovine genomics.Veterinary and animal science · 2024Review
- Advancing crop disease resistance through genome editing: a promising approach for enhancing agricultural production.Frontiers in genome editing · 2024Review
- Review
- Public perception of plant gene technologies worldwide in the light of food security.GM crops & food · 2022Article
- Article
- CRISPR-Cas technology a new era in genomic engineering.Biotechnology reports (Amsterdam, Netherlands) · 2022Review
- Entailing the Next-Generation Sequencing and Metabolome for Sustainable Agriculture by Improving Plant Tolerance.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022Review
- Genome-editing in millets: current knowledge and future perspectives.Molecular biology reports · 2022Review
- Environmental and socio-economic impacts of new plant breeding technologies: A case study of root chicory for inulin production.Frontiers in genome editing · 2022Article
- Herbicide Resistance: Another Hot Agronomic Trait for Plant Genome Editing.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Review
- Genomic Analysis, Progress and Future Perspectives in Dairy Cattle Selection: A Review.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2021Review
- New Frontiers in Biosafety and Biosecurity.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2021Article
- Article
- Review
- Meeting report of the OECD conference on "Genome Editing: Applications in Agriculture-Implications for Health, Environment and Regulation".Transgenic research · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Genome editing, particularly using of site-directed nucleases such as the CRISPR system, has spread rapidly through the biological sciences. Genome editing in crops could significantly speed up the progress of breeding programs. It could drive the development of traits in new crops and allow improvements in yield and pest resistance, adaptation to climate change, and industrial and pharmaceutical applications. However biofortification is a key challenge to satisfy nutritional needs in vitamins for developing countries and new consumer's needs for developed countries. China and the USA lead scientific research in crop editing. Nigeria, being headquarters to numerous research consortia, is the most involved country in Africa. Genome editing in animals including pig, cattle, sheep, and carp, has not merely accelerated research but has made possible research that was previously unfeasible. It has been used to increase disease resistance, to make livestock better adapted to farming or environmental conditions, to increase fertility and growth, and to improve animal welfare. The USA, the UK and China are the most involved countries in animal genome editing. Global food production needs to increase as much as 70 per cent to support the growing population. Genome editing could contribute improving the efficiency of food distribution and reducing waste. Depending on the regulatory conditions, genome editing could open up the field to smaller companies and public labs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.