Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31321662›Full record

ArticleBrain imaging and behavior2020

Exploring characteristic features of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder: findings from multi-modal MRI and candidate genetic data.

Jae Hyun Yoo, Johanna Inhyang Kim, Bung-Nyun Kim, Bumseok Jeong

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Brain imaging and behavior, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 33 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Beyond traditional orthopaedic data analysis: AI, multimodal models and continuous monitoring.Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA · 2025
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. The structural connectome in ADHD.Psychoradiology · 2021
    Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Neuroimaging-Based Deep Learning in Autism Spectrum Disorder and Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder.Soa--ch'ongsonyon chongsin uihak = Journal of child & adolescent psychiatry · 2020
    Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Jae Hyun YooDepartment of Psychiatry, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, 222 Banpo-daero, Seocho-gu, Seoul, 06591, Republic of Korea.
Johanna Inhyang KimDepartment of Psychiatry, Hanyang University Medical Center, 222-1 Wangsimni-ro, Seongdong-gu, Seoul, 04763, Republic of Korea.
Bung-Nyun Kim *Division of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Department of Neuropsychiatry, Seoul National University Hospital College of Medicine, 101 Daehak-no, Chongno-gu, Seoul, 03080, Republic of Korea. kbn1@snu.ac.kr.
Bumseok Jeong *Laboratory of Computational Affective Neuroscience and Development, Graduate School of Medical Science and Engineering, Korea Advanced Institute for Science and Technology (KAIST), 291 Daehak-ro, Yuseong-gu, Daejeon, 34141, Republic of Korea. bs.jeong@kaist.ac.kr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6805-6535
Hanyang University Medical Center · KRKorea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology · KRSeoul National University Hospital · KRThe Catholic University of Korea Seoul St. Mary's Hospital · KR

Funding

National Research Foundation of Korea 2015M3C7A1028926National Research Foundation of Korea 2016M3C7A1914448
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The current study examined whether machine learning features best distinguishing attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) from typically developing children (TDC) can explain clinical phenotypes using multi-modal neuroimaging and genetic data. Cortical morphology, diffusivity scalars, resting-state functional connectivity and polygenic risk score (PS) from norepinephrine, dopamine and glutamate genes were extracted from 47 ADHD and 47 matched TDC. Using random forests, classification accuracy was measured for each uni- and multi-modal model. The optimal model was used to explain symptom severity or task performance and its robustness was validated in the independent dataset including 18 ADHD and 18 TDC. The model consisting of cortical thickness and volume features achieved the best accuracy of 85.1%. Morphological changes across insula, sensory/motor, and inferior frontal cortex were also found as key predictors. Those explained 18.0% of ADHD rating scale, while dynamic regional homogeneity within default network explained 6.4% of the omission errors in continuous performance test. Ensemble of PS to optimal model showed minor effect on accuracy. Validation analysis achieved accuracy of 69.4%. Current findings suggest that structural deformities relevant to salience detection, sensory processing, and response inhibition may be robust classifiers and symptom predictors of ADHD. Altered local functional connectivity across default network predicted attentional lapse. However, further investigation is needed to clarify roles of genetic predisposition.

Indexed as

Attention Deficit Disorder with HyperactivityBrain MappingCerebral CortexChildFrontal LobeHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingAttention deficit hyperactivity disorderGenetic polymorphismsMachine learningMultimodal imaging

Identifiers

PMID31321662
OpenAlexW2962628575

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.