Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31321658›Full record

ReviewJournal of interventional cardiac electrophysiology : an international journal of arrhythmias and pacing2019

Multisite pacing via a quadripolar lead for cardiac resynchronization therapy.

Alexandre Bodin, Arnaud Bisson, Clémentine Andre, Bertrand Pierre, Laurent Fauchier, Dominique Babuty, Nicolas Clementy

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of interventional cardiac electrophysiology : an international journal of arrhythmias and pacing, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Alexandre BodinService de Cardiologie, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Trousseau et EA7505, Faculté de Médecine, Université François Rabelais, Tours, France. alexandre.bodin@etu.univ-tours.fr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6544-3916
Arnaud BissonService de Cardiologie, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Trousseau et EA7505, Faculté de Médecine, Université François Rabelais, Tours, France.
Clémentine AndreService de Cardiologie, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Trousseau et EA7505, Faculté de Médecine, Université François Rabelais, Tours, France.
Bertrand PierreService de Cardiologie, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Trousseau et EA7505, Faculté de Médecine, Université François Rabelais, Tours, France.
Laurent FauchierService de Cardiologie, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Trousseau et EA7505, Faculté de Médecine, Université François Rabelais, Tours, France.
Dominique BabutyService de Cardiologie, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Trousseau et EA7505, Faculté de Médecine, Université François Rabelais, Tours, France.
Nicolas ClementyService de Cardiologie, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Trousseau et EA7505, Faculté de Médecine, Université François Rabelais, Tours, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cardiac resynchronization therapy is challenging. Up to 40% of patients are non-responder. Multisite pacing via a quadripolar lead, also called multipoint/multipole pacing (MPP), is a debated alternative. In this review, we summarize evidence in the literature, tips and pitfalls related to MPP programming, and the different algorithms of MPP in different manufacturers.

Indexed as

Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy DevicesAlgorithmsCardiac Resynchronization TherapyElectrodes, ImplantedHumansBiventricular pacingCardiac resynchronization therapyMultipoint pacingMultisite pacing

Identifiers

PMID31321658

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.