ArticleJournal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology2020
Clinical effectiveness of an outpatient pathway for low-risk chest pain emergency department visits.
Article in Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundStudies suggest that patients who present with atypical chest pain and are low or low-intermediate risk can safely undergo a rapid rule-out for cardiac ischemia with serial ECGs and cardiac biomarkers followed by additional testing as needed. We sought to evaluate a novel Emergency Department (ED) protocol for patients to undergo their additional functional testing as an outpatient.
methodsPatients presenting to the ED with atypical chest pain, normal ECG, and negative cardiac troponin felt to be low risk were referred for outpatient stress testing within 72 hours of presentation as part of a pilot program. We analyzed test characteristics, length of stay, and 30-day return visits to ED in the pilot group and compared results to a similar cohort assessed in the ED by a traditional chest pain observation protocol.
resultsA total of 156 patients were included over a 5-month period with 29.5% not returning for testing. There was a 70% reduction in length of stay for outpatient stress test protocol patients. All-cause and cardiac return visits to the ED were not significantly different between the outpatient cohort and the traditional chest pain unit group and were reduced by 47 and 75%, respectively, in patients who completed their outpatient testing. The provisional injection protocol resulted in a 81% reduction in radiation exposure when compared to traditional MPI stress protocols due to a greater utilization of exercise treadmill tests without imaging.
conclusionOutpatient stress testing is a reliable alternative to traditional chest pain observation with a significantly shorter length of stay, reduced healthcare costs, and improved radiation safety profile for patients when compared to traditional inpatient observation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
31321618What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.