Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31321517›Full record

Observational studyJournal of neurology2019

Development and validation of the Heidelberg Neurological Triage System (HEINTS).

Hanna M Oßwald, Linda Harenberg, Hannah Jaschonek, Sibu Mundiyanapurath, Jan C Purrucker, Geraldine Rauch, Peter A Ringleb, Simon Nagel

Abstract readObservational StudyValidation Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Observational study in Journal of neurology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Models of care in emergency neurology: from the Neuro Fast Track to the emergency neurologist-a position paper of the Italian Association for Emergency Neurology (ANEU).Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2023
    Article
  4. Observational
  5. Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Hanna M OßwaldDepartment of Neurology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.
Linda HarenbergDepartment of Neurology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.
Hannah JaschonekDepartment of Neurology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.
Sibu MundiyanapurathDepartment of Neurology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.
Jan C PurruckerDepartment of Neurology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.
Geraldine RauchInstitute of Medical Biometry and Informatics, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.
Peter A RinglebDepartment of Neurology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.
Simon NagelDepartment of Neurology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany. simon.nagel@med.uni-heidelberg.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2471-6647
Heidelberg University · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND/

objectiveNeurological syndromes are underrepresented in existing triage systems which are not validated for neurological patients; therefore, we developed and validated the new Heidelberg Neurological Triage System (HEINTS) in a prospective, single-center observational study.

methodsPatients were triaged according to the new triage system by nurses and physicians (stage 1) as well as trained nurses (stage 2). In stage 1, all patients presenting to the neurological emergency room (ER) were triaged by nurses and physicians. In stage 2, three specially trained nurses triaged patients according to HEINTS. The main outcomes comprised interrater agreement between nurses' and physicians' triage (stage 1), sensitivity and specificity to detect emergencies (stages 1 and 2), and improvement in triage quality as a result of training (stage 2), as well as correlation of HEINTS with hospital admissions and resource utilization.

resultsIn stage 1 (n = 2423 patients), sensitivity and specificity to detect neurological emergencies were 84.2% (SD 0.8%) and 85.4% (SD 0.8%) for nurses, as well as 92.4% (SD 0.6%) and 84.1% (SD 0.9%) for physicians, respectively. The interrater-reliability between nurses and physicians in stage 1 was moderate [Cohen's kappa 0.44, standard deviation (SD) 0.02]. In stage 2 (n = 506 patients), sensitivity of trained nurses increased to 94.3% (SD 1.0%), while specificity decreased to 74.8% (SD 1.9%). Correlation of HEINTS triage with hospital admission and resource utilization in both stages was highly significant.

conclusionsHEINTS predicted hospital admissions and resource utilization. Agreement between nurses and physicians was moderate. HEINTS, applied by physicians and by nurses after training, reliably detected neurological emergencies.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsNervous System DiseasesSeverity of Illness IndexEmergency Medical ServicesEmergency Service, HospitalHumansTriageEmergency roomNeurological emergencyTriage

Identifiers

PMID31321517
OpenAlexW2963672181

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.