Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31321446›Full record

ArticleOsteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA2019

Two-year persistence with teriparatide improved significantly after introduction of an educational and motivational support program.

M A van Maren, C E Wyers, J H M Driessen, J V Visser, F de Vries, K van de Wijdeven, S Gevers, W F Lems, M H Emmelot-Vonk, J P W van den Bergh

Abstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. A quasi-experimental study about shared decision-making and motivational interviewing on patients with a recent fracture attending Fracture Liaison Services.Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research · 2024
    Article
  6. Cost-effectiveness analysis of fracture liaison services: a Markov model using Dutch real-world data.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Supporting patients to get the best from their osteoporosis treatment: a rapid realist review of what works, for whom, and in what circumstance.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2022
    Review
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

M A van MarenDepartment of Internal Medicine, VieCuri Medical Center, Tegelseweg 210, 5912 BL, Venlo, the Netherlands.
C E WyersDepartment of Internal Medicine, VieCuri Medical Center, Tegelseweg 210, 5912 BL, Venlo, the Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7662-3990
J H M DriessenNUTRIM School for Nutrition and Translational Research in Metabolism, Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands.
J V VisserApotheekZorg, Bladel, the Netherlands.
F de VriesDivision of Pharmacoepidemiology and Clinical Epidemiology, Utrecht Institute for Pharmaceutical Sciences, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
K van de WijdevenApotheekZorg, Bladel, the Netherlands.
S GeversApotheekZorg, Bladel, the Netherlands.
W F LemsLocation VU Medical Center, Department of Rheumatology and Immunology, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
M H Emmelot-VonkDepartment of Geriatric Medicine, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
J P W van den BerghDepartment of Internal Medicine, VieCuri Medical Center, Tegelseweg 210, 5912 BL, Venlo, the Netherlands. jvdbergh@viecuri.nl.

Funding

Interdisciplinary working group osteoporosis foundation Not applicable
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study evaluated the 2-year persistence with teriparatide in the Netherlands. Analyses showed that the risk of non-persistence was 28% lower in patients who were followed according to an additional educational and motivational support program.

introductionUntil recently, teriparatide (TPTD) was a third-line treatment option for severe osteoporosis in the Netherlands, which could only be prescribed by medical specialists based on a specific medical statement. We aimed to determine whether an educational and motivational support program (EMSP) increased 2-year treatment persistence with TPTD in patients with severe osteoporosis.

methodsWe evaluated persistence in 1573 Dutch patients treated with TPTD from January 2013 until January 2018. From January 2013 onwards, all patients received a basic support program (BSP) consisting of an educational home visit to initiate TPTD treatment and phone calls (at 1, 2.5 and 8 weeks). Since May 2015, all patients received the EMSP consisting of the BSP extended with evaluation of medication adherence during phone calls, an additional phone call (at 12 months), and motivational letters at 9 and 14 months.

resultsThe EMSP showed a statistically significantly higher 2-year persistence (78%) with TPTD as compared with the BSP (72%). Reasons for treatment discontinuation were comparable between groups, except for the proportion of patients who had stopped TPTD administration due to side effects, which was significantly lower in the EMSP group (8% vs. 15% in BSP, p < 0.001). Overall, the risk of non-persistence was 28% lower in the EMSP compared with the BSP group (HR: 0.72; 95% CI: 0.55-0.93).

conclusionThe introduction of the EMSP has demonstrated to improve the persistence with TPTD, resulting in 78% of the patients being persistent with TPTD during the 2-year treatment period.

Indexed as

Drug MonitoringAgedAged, 80 and overAge FactorsBone Density Conservation AgentsDrug Administration ScheduleFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansMaleMedication AdherenceMiddle AgedMotivationNetherlandsOsteoporosisOsteoporosis, PostmenopausalBone Density Conservation AgentsTeriparatideEducational programOsteoporosisPersistenceSupport programTeriparatide

Identifiers

PMID31321446
PMCPMC6717185

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.