Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31321370›Full record

ArticleJournal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. Global research & reviews2019

When Polyethylene Exchange Is Appropriate for Prosthetic Knee Instability.

Thomas K Fehring, Robert Baird, Brian Park, Craig Della Valle

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. Global research & reviews, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Thomas K FehringOrthoCarolina Hip and Knee Center, Charlotte, NC (Dr. Fehring); the Orthopaedic Group (Dr. Baird); Kaiser Permanente, Department of Reconstructive Surgery, Oakland, CA (Dr. Park); and the Midwest Orthopaedics at Rush, Chicago, IL (Dr. Della Valle).
Robert BairdOrthoCarolina Hip and Knee Center, Charlotte, NC (Dr. Fehring); the Orthopaedic Group (Dr. Baird); Kaiser Permanente, Department of Reconstructive Surgery, Oakland, CA (Dr. Park); and the Midwest Orthopaedics at Rush, Chicago, IL (Dr. Della Valle).
Brian ParkOrthoCarolina Hip and Knee Center, Charlotte, NC (Dr. Fehring); the Orthopaedic Group (Dr. Baird); Kaiser Permanente, Department of Reconstructive Surgery, Oakland, CA (Dr. Park); and the Midwest Orthopaedics at Rush, Chicago, IL (Dr. Della Valle).
Craig Della ValleOrthoCarolina Hip and Knee Center, Charlotte, NC (Dr. Fehring); the Orthopaedic Group (Dr. Baird); Kaiser Permanente, Department of Reconstructive Surgery, Oakland, CA (Dr. Park); and the Midwest Orthopaedics at Rush, Chicago, IL (Dr. Della Valle).
Creative Commons · USKaiser Permanente · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionProsthetic knee instability is a common cause of patient dissatisfaction and early failure after total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Strategies to manage such instability are dependent on the recognition of the presenting instability pattern because some require full revision, whereas others can be managed by polyethylene exchange (PE) only. This retrospective chart review classifies and reports on a series of patients where PE only was used to manage an unstable TKA.

methodsOf 1606 revision TKA patients, 4% underwent an isolated PE for prosthetic knee instability. All cases were classified using the novel OrthoCarolina Prosthetic Knee Instability Classification System. This classification system was established to guide surgeons in the diagnosis and surgical management of periprosthetic knee instability. The final data set included 41 patients at an average follow-up of 43 months.

resultsOf the patients treated with poly exchange only for an appropriate indication (ie, coronal instability with competent ligaments or global instability), 63% felt their knee was stable, whereas 37% felt they remained unstable after revision. Additionally, only 59% had improvement in their pain, whereas 41% were dissatisfied with their pain relief after revision. DISCUSSION: Despite the use of this technique when indicated, the results of PE only with regard to pain and instability are unpredictable. Only approximately 50% of patients became stable and had adequate pain relief. Patients and surgeons alike should understand that this low morbidity option does not guarantee a good result regardless of whether it is used for an appropriate indication. Obtaining stability and pain relief in a patient with prosthetic knee instability remains a significant challenge. Therefore, the key to avoiding prosthetic knee instability is through prevention at the time of primary surgery. Prosthetic knee instability remains difficult to manage despite intuitive and appropriate indications for PE only.

Identifiers

PMID31321370
PMCPMC6553628
OpenAlexW3003043587

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.