Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31321318›Full record

ArticleBMJ paediatrics open2019

Primary care clinicians' views of paediatric respiratory infection surveillance information to inform clinical decision-making: a qualitative study.

Emma C Anderson, Joanna May Kesten, Isabel Lane, Alastair D Hay, Timothy Moss, Christie Cabral

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ paediatrics open, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Emma C AndersonCentre for Academic Child Health, Bristol Medical School: Population Health Sciences, University of Bristol School of Social and Community Medicine, Bristol, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-4639-9067
Joanna May KestenNIHR Collaboration for Leadership in Applied Health Research and Care West and NIHR Health Protection Research Unit in Evaluation of Interventions, University of Bristol School of Social and Community Medicine, Bristol, UK.
Isabel LaneCentre for Academic Primary Care, NIHR School for Primary Care Research, University of Bristol School of Social and Community Medicine, Bristol, UK.
Alastair D HayNIHR Health Protection Research Unit in Evaluation of Interventions, Centre for Academic Primary Care, University of Bristol School of Social and Community Medicine, Bristol, UK.
Timothy MossDepartment of Health and Social Sciences, University of the West of England, Bristol, UK.
Christie CabralCentre for Academic Primary Care, University of Bristol School of Social and Community Medicine, Bristol, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimTo investigate primary care clinicians' views of a prototype locally relevant, real-time viral surveillance system to assist diagnostic decision-making and antibiotic prescribing for paediatric respiratory tract infections (RTI). Clinicians' perspectives on the content, anticipated use and impact were explored to inform intervention development.

backgroundChildren with RTIs are overprescribed antibiotics. Pressures on primary care and diagnostic uncertainty can lead to decisional biases towards prescribing. We hypothesise that real-time paediatric RTI surveillance data could reduce diagnostic uncertainty and help reduce unnecessary antibiotic prescribing. METHODOLOGY: Semistructured one-to-one interviews with 21 clinicians from a range of urban general practitioner surgeries explored the clinical context and views of the prototype system. Transcripts were analysed using thematic analysis.

resultsThough clinicians self-identified as rational (not over)prescribers, cognitive biases influenced antibiotic prescribing decisions. Clinicians sought to avoid 'anticipated regret' around not prescribing for a child who then deteriorated. Clinicians were not aware of formal infection surveillance information sources (tending to assume many viruses are around), perceiving the information as novel and potentially useful. Perceptions of surveillance information as presented included: not relevant to decision-making/management; useful to confirm decisions post hoc; and increasing risks of missing sick children. Clinicians expressed wariness of using population-level data to influence individual patient decision-making and expressed preference for threat (high-risk) information identified by surveillance, rather than reassuring information about viral RTIs.

conclusionsMore work is needed to develop a surveillance intervention if it is to beneficially influence decision-making and antibiotic prescribing in primary care. Key challenges for developing interventions are how to address cognitive biases and how to communicate reassuring information to risk-oriented clinicians.

Indexed as

general paediatricsinfectious diseasesrespiratory

Identifiers

PMID31321318
PMCPMC6597489

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.