Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31321282›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of cardiology. Heart & vasculature2019

Efficacy and safety of clopidogrel only vs. clopidogrel added proton pump inhibitors in the treatment of patients with coronary heart disease after percutaneous coronary intervention: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Jun Pang, Qiang Wu, Zheng Zhang, Tong-Zhang Zheng, Qiuling Xiang, Ping Zhang, Xiaoqiao Liu, Changhai Zhang, Hongwen Tan, Jing Huang and 15 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of cardiology. Heart & vasculature, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

25 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Jun PangDepartment of Cardiology, Guizhou Provincial People's Hospital, Guiyang 550002, China.
Qiang WuDepartment of Cardiology, Guizhou Provincial People's Hospital, Guiyang 550002, China.
Zheng ZhangDepartment of Cardiology, The First Hospital of Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China.
Tong-Zhang ZhengDepartment of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, Brown University, Providence, RI, USA.
Qiuling XiangZhongshan School of Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong 510080, China.
Ping ZhangDepartment of Cardiology, Guizhou Provincial People's Hospital, Guiyang 550002, China.
Xiaoqiao LiuDepartment of Cardiology, Guizhou Provincial People's Hospital, Guiyang 550002, China.
Changhai ZhangDepartment of Cardiology, Guizhou Provincial People's Hospital, Guiyang 550002, China.
Hongwen TanDepartment of Cardiology, Guizhou Provincial People's Hospital, Guiyang 550002, China.
Jing HuangDepartment of Cardiology, Guizhou Provincial People's Hospital, Guiyang 550002, China.
Wei LiuDepartment of Cardiology, Guizhou Provincial People's Hospital, Guiyang 550002, China.
Fang SongDepartment of Cardiology, Guizhou Provincial People's Hospital, Guiyang 550002, China.
Hongwen TanDepartment of Cardiology, Guizhou Provincial People's Hospital, Guiyang 550002, China.
Zongzhuang LiDepartment of Cardiology, Guizhou Provincial People's Hospital, Guiyang 550002, China.
Feng YueDepartment of Cardiology, Guizhou Provincial People's Hospital, Guiyang 550002, China.
Zhi JiangDepartment of Cardiology, Guizhou Provincial People's Hospital, Guiyang 550002, China.
Fang WeiDepartment of Cardiology, Guizhou Provincial People's Hospital, Guiyang 550002, China.
Kai ZhouDepartment of Cardiology, Guizhou Provincial People's Hospital, Guiyang 550002, China.
Feng TangDepartment of Cardiology, Guizhou Provincial People's Hospital, Guiyang 550002, China.
Yongyao YangDepartment of Cardiology, Guizhou Provincial People's Hospital, Guiyang 550002, China.
Xiangshu LongDepartment of Cardiology, Guizhou Provincial People's Hospital, Guiyang 550002, China.
Chunyan KuangDepartment of Cardiology, Guizhou Provincial People's Hospital, Guiyang 550002, China.
Yueting WuDepartment of Cardiology, Guizhou Provincial People's Hospital, Guiyang 550002, China.
Baolin ChenDepartment of Cardiology, Guizhou Provincial People's Hospital, Guiyang 550002, China.
Ye TianDepartment of Cardiology, Guizhou Provincial People's Hospital, Guiyang 550002, China.
Guizhou Provincial People's Hospital · CNBrown University · USLanzhou University · CNSun Yat-sen University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundControversy still exists that whether clopidogrel should add proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) in patients with coronary heart disease after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of clopidogrel added proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) vs. clopidogrel for the treatment of patients with coronary heart disease after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). METHODS AND

resultsWe systematically searched PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, the Chinese Biomedical Medical Literature database, and the Cochrane Library for all clinical trials that were published on this topic through October 2018. We specifically selected the clinical trials that evaluated the efficacy and safety of clopidogrel added proton pump inhibitors vs. clopidogrel in the treatment of patients with coronary heart disease after PCI. RevMan 5.0 software was used for quantitative data analyses.15 randomized controlled trials including 50,366 patients were included. The meta-analysis results showed that compared with the clopidogrel added PPI group, the non-PPI group had significantly less risk of MACE[RR = 0.82,95%CI:0.77-0.88], myocardial infarction recurrence[RR = 0.72,95%CI:0.57-0.90], stent thrombosis[RR = 0.71,95%CI:0.56-0.92], Target vessel revascularization (TVR)[RR = 0.77,95%CI:0.63-0.93] and stroke [RR = 0.72,95%CI:0.67-0.76]. The risks of all cause death [RR = 1.14,95%CI:0.85-1.51], cardiovascular death [RR = 1.14, 95% CI: 0.85-1.52], bleedings events [RR = 1.60,95%CI:0.53-4.81] were similar in the two groups.

conclusionsThe patients in the non-PPI group were observed to be associated with less risk of MACE, myocardial infarction recurrence, stent thrombosis, target vessel revascularization (TVR) and stroke. And the two groups had similar all cause death, cardiovascular death, bleedings events.

Indexed as

Cardiovascular outcomeClopidogrelMeta-analysisProton pump inhibitor (PPI)

Identifiers

PMID31321282
PMCPMC6612751
OpenAlexW2929614885

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.