Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31321227›Full record

SynthesisBioMed research international2019

A Systematic Review of Thirty-One Assessment Tests to Evaluate Mobility in Older Adults.

Racha Soubra, Aly Chkeir, Jean-Luc Novella

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BioMed research international, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 80 papers, 8 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
80citing papers in PubMed, 8 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

80 citing papers in PubMed, 8 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Trial
  14. Trial
  15. Trial
  16. Trial
  17. Trial
  18. Trial
  19. Trial
  20. Recommendations from the Geriatric Oncology Working Group of the Spanish Society of Radiation Oncology for the treatment of elderly patients with radiotherapy.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2026
    Review

20 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Racha SoubraLaboratoire de Modélisation et Sûreté des Systèmes (M2S), Université de Technologie de Troyes, 12 rue Marie Curie, 10004 Troyes, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7098-950X
Aly ChkeirLaboratoire de Modélisation et Sûreté des Systèmes (M2S), Université de Technologie de Troyes, 12 rue Marie Curie, 10004 Troyes, France.
Jean-Luc NovellaService de Gériatrie - CHU Reims, Hôpital Maison Blanche, 45 rue Cognacq Jay, 51100 Reims, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Assessments of gait, balance, and transfer in elderly people play a valuable role in maintaining healthy aging and preventing a decline in mobility. Several evaluation tools have been proposed; however, clinicians should select the most accurate ones wisely, based on numerous criteria. This systematic review aims to identify all applicable elderly mobility assessment tests and show their measurement properties with as much detail as possible. Initially, a broad search was performed. Articles were screened based on their titles and abstracts, and only studies published in English were considered. Based on our inclusion and exclusion criteria, 31 assessment tests evaluating the mobility of healthy elderly people were found. Then, further searches were completed to identify the measurement properties of each test. These characteristics include the origin and year of establishment, several practicality factors, and validity. The analysis of our outcomes illustrates the similarities and differences between the identified tests.

Indexed as

Geriatric AssessmentMonitoring, PhysiologicAgedGaitHumansPostural BalanceRange of Motion, Articular

Identifiers

PMID31321227
PMCPMC6610744

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.