SynthesisBMJ global health2019
Should oral contraceptive pills be available without a prescription? A systematic review of over-the-counter and pharmacy access availability.
Synthesis in BMJ global health, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
24 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Pooled it
- Patient and pharmacist perspectives on pharmacist-prescribed contraception: A systematic review.Contraception · 2021Pooled it
- Family planning self-care: From global frameworks to local meaning, perceptions, experiences and opportunities in Niger.PLOS global public health · 2026Article
- An electrochemical immunosensor for intraepithelial neoplasia in cervicovaginal lavage using a fullerene-TCNQ platform for p16 detection.Analytical and bioanalytical chemistry · 2025Article
- Article
- Oral contraceptive use and its sociocultural determinants in Iranian women: a secondary cross-sectional analysis from the PARS cohort study.Contraception and reproductive medicine · 2025Article
- A review of recommendations, efficacy, and patient safety for over-the-counter norgestrel for daily contraception.Exploratory research in clinical and social pharmacy · 2025Article
- Community pharmacists improving equitable access to contraceptive methods: a commentary.International journal of clinical pharmacy · 2025Article
- Transnational Health and Self-care Experiences of Japanese Women who have taken Oral Contraceptives in South Korea, including Over-the-counter Access: Insights from Semi-structured Interviews.Asian bioethics review · 2024Article
- Exploring Contraceptive Experiences of Abortion-Fund Clients in the Rocky Mountain Region of the United States from a Reproductive Justice Lens.Women's reproductive health (Philadelphia, Pa.) · 2024Article
- Disruptions and opportunities in sexual and reproductive health care: How COVID-19 impacted service provision in three US states.Perspectives on sexual and reproductive health · 2022Article
- Pathways to reproductive autonomy: Using path analysis to predict family planning outcomes in the United States.Health & social care in the community · 2022Article
- Reclassifying contraceptives as over-the-counter medicines to improve access.Bulletin of the World Health Organization · 2022Review
- Self-care interventions for sexual and reproductive health in humanitarian and fragile settings: a scoping review.BMC health services research · 2022Article
- Contraceptive self-injection through routine service delivery: Experiences of Ugandan women in the public health system.Frontiers in global women's health · 2022Article
- Enabling women to access preferred methods of contraception: a rapid review and behavioural analysis.BMC public health · 2021Review
- Physicians' Opinion Regarding Extended Access to Hormonal Contraception in Switzerland.Pharmacy (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- Adolescents' and Young Adults' Ability to Self-Screen for Contraindications to Hormonal Contraception and the Role of Chronic Illness.The Journal of adolescent health : official publication of the Society for Adolescent Medicine · 2021Article
- Sexual and reproductive health self-care in humanitarian and fragile settings: where should we start?Conflict and health · 2021Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionMaking oral contraceptives (OC) available over the counter (OTC) could reduce barriers to use. To inform WHO guidelines on self-care interventions, we conducted a systematic review of OTC availability of OCs.
methodsWe reviewed data on both effectiveness and values and preferences surrounding OTC availability of OCs. For the effectiveness review, peer-reviewed articles were included if they compared either full OTC availability or pharmacist-prescribing (behind-the-counter availability) to prescription-only availability of OCs and measured an outcome of interest. For the values and preferences review, we included peer-reviewed articles that presented primary data (qualitative or quantitative) examining people's preferences regarding OTC access to OCs. We searched PubMed, CINAHL, LILACS and EMBASE through November 2018 and extracted data in duplicate.
resultsThe effectiveness review included four studies with 5197 total participants. Two studies from the 2000s compared women who obtained OCs OTC in Mexico to women who obtained OCs from providers in either Mexico or the USA. OTC users had higher OC continuation rates over 9 months of follow-up (adjusted HR: 1.58, 95 % CI 1.11 to 2.26). One study found OTC users were more likely to report at least one WHO category 3 contraindication (13.4% vs 8.6%, p=0.006), but not category 4 contraindications; the other study found no differences in contraindicated use. One study found lower side effects among OTC users and high patient satisfaction with both OTC and prescription access. Two cross-sectional studies from the 1970s in Colombia and Mexico found no major differences in OC continuation, but some indication of slightly higher side effects with OTC access. In 23 values and preference studies, women generally favoured OTC availability. Providers showed more modest support, with pharmacists expressing greater support than physicians. Support was generally higher for progestogen-only pills compared with combination OCs.
conclusionA small evidence base suggests women who obtain OCs OTC may have higher continuation rates and limited contraindicated use. Patients and providers generally support OTC availability. OTC availability may increase access to this effective contraceptive option and reduce unintended pregnancies. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42019119406.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.