Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31321076›Full record

ArticleRMD open2019

Implementation and role of modern musculoskeletal imaging in rheumatological practice in member countries of EULAR.

Peter Mandl, Anna Ciechomska, L Terslev, Xenofon Baraliakos, P G Conaghan, Maria Antonietta D'Agostino, Annamaria Iagnocco, Conny J van der Laken, Mikkel Ostergaard, E Naredo

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in RMD open, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Guideline
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Frontiers in medicine · 2022
    Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Peter MandlDepartment of Rheumatology, Medical University Vienna, Vienna, Austria.ORCID 0000-0003-1526-4052
Anna CiechomskaDepartment of Rheumatology, Wishaw General Hospital, Wishaw, UK.
L TerslevCenter for Rheumatology and Spine Diseases, Copenhagen University Hospital Glostrup, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Xenofon BaraliakosRheumazentrum Ruhrgebiet Sankt Josefs-Krankenhaus, Herne, Nordrhein-Westfalen, Germany.
P G ConaghanRheumatology, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, UK.
Maria Antonietta D'AgostinoRheumatology, Ambroise Paré Hospital, APHP, Université Versailles-Saint-Quentin en Yvelines, Boulogne-Billancourt, France.ORCID 0000-0002-5347-0060
Annamaria IagnoccoScienze Cliniche e Biologiche, Università degli Studi di Torino, Rome, Italy.
Conny J van der LakenDepartment of Rheumatology, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, Noord-Holland, The Netherlands.
Mikkel OstergaardCopenhagen Center for Arthritis Research, Center for Rheumatology and Spine Diseases, Rigshospitalet Glostrup, Glostrup, Denmark.
E NaredoDepartment of Rheumatology, Joint and Bone Research Unit, Hospital Universitario Fundación Jiménez Díaz and Autónoma University, Madrid, Spain.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectives: To document the current training, implementation and role of modern musculoskeletal imaging techniques: ultrasound, magnetic resonance imaging, computed tomography and positron emission tomography, among rheumatologists in the member countries of the EULAR. Methods: English-language questionnaires for each imaging modality developed by a EULAR task force were sent out to national and international scientific societies as well as imaging experts in the given modalities involved in research and/or training. The surveys were distributed via an online survey tool (SurveyMonkey). Simple descriptive and summary statistics were calculated from the responses. Results: More than 90% of ultrasound (US) experts reported the availability of a US unit in their department. Suspicion of rheumatoid arthritis and spondyloarthritides were the main clinical indications for performing US for diagnostic purposes. Suspicion of sacroiliitis and degenerative spine disease were the most common indications to perform magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) or computed tomography (CT) for diagnostic purposes, while positron emission tomography was mainly performed to diagnose large vessel vasculitis and to investigate fever of unknown origin. The reported percentage of rheumatologists performing US was highly variable, ranging from more than 80% in 6% of countries to less than 10% in 15% of countries. The majority of experts (77%) reported that their national rheumatology societies organise musculoskeletal US courses, while courses in MRI or CT organised by the national rheumatology societies were less commonly reported (29% and 8%, respectively). Conclusions: Rheumatologists in Europe utilise modern imaging techniques; however, access to the techniques and training offered is varied.

Indexed as

Arthritis, RheumatoidEuropeFever of Unknown OriginHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMusculoskeletal SystemOsteoarthritisPositron-Emission TomographyRheumatoid VasculitisRheumatologistsRheumatologySacroiliitisSpineSpondylitis, AnkylosingSurveys and QuestionnairesTomography, X-Ray Computedhealth services researchMRIultrasonography

Identifiers

PMID31321076
PMCPMC6606074

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.