Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31321002›Full record

ReviewComputational and structural biotechnology journal2019

Spotting, Transcription and

Jory Lietard, Mark M Somoza

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Computational and structural biotechnology journal, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Jory LietardInstitute of Inorganic Chemistry, Faculty of Chemistry, University of Vienna, Althanstraße 14, UZA II, 1090 Vienna, Austria.
Mark M SomozaInstitute of Inorganic Chemistry, Faculty of Chemistry, University of Vienna, Althanstraße 14, UZA II, 1090 Vienna, Austria.

Funding

Austrian Science Fund FWF P 30596
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

DNA microarrays have become commonplace in the last two decades, but the synthesis of other nucleic acids biochips, most importantly RNA, has only recently been developed to a similar extent. RNA microarrays can be seen as organized surfaces displaying a potentially very large number of unique sequences and are of invaluable help in understanding the complexity of RNA structure and function as they allow the probing and treatment of each of the many different sequences simultaneously. Three approaches have emerged for the fabrication of RNA microarrays. The earliest examples used a direct, manual or mechanical, deposition of pre-synthesized, purified RNA oligonucleotides onto the surface in a process called spotting. In a second approach, pre-spotted or

Indexed as

in situ RNA synthesisMicroarrayPhosphoramiditesPhotolithographyRNASolid-phase synthesisSpottingTranscription

Identifiers

PMID31321002
PMCPMC6612525

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.