Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31320993›Full record

ArticleOncotarget2019

Cell-free DNA in newly diagnosed patients with glioblastoma - a clinical prospective feasibility study.

Dorte Schou Nørøxe, Olga Østrup, Christina Westmose Yde, Lise Barlebo Ahlborn, Finn Cilius Nielsen, Signe Regner Michaelsen, Vibeke Andrée Larsen, Jane Skjøth-Rasmussen, Jannick Brennum, Petra Hamerlik and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Oncotarget, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. A Synopsis of Biomarkers in Glioblastoma: Past and Present.Current issues in molecular biology · 2024
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Quantitative analysis of plasma DNA in anal cancer patients.Contemporary oncology (Poznan, Poland) · 2022
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Prognostic and Predictive Biomarkers in Gliomas.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2021
    Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Dorte Schou NørøxeDepartment of Radiation Biology, Rigshospitalet, 2100 Copenhagen, Denmark.
Olga ØstrupCenter for Genomic Medicine, Rigshospitalet, 2100 Copenhagen, Denmark.
Christina Westmose YdeCenter for Genomic Medicine, Rigshospitalet, 2100 Copenhagen, Denmark.
Lise Barlebo AhlbornCenter for Genomic Medicine, Rigshospitalet, 2100 Copenhagen, Denmark.
Finn Cilius NielsenCenter for Genomic Medicine, Rigshospitalet, 2100 Copenhagen, Denmark.
Signe Regner MichaelsenDepartment of Radiation Biology, Rigshospitalet, 2100 Copenhagen, Denmark.
Vibeke Andrée LarsenDepartment of Neuroradiology, Rigshospitalet, 2100 Copenhagen, Denmark.
Jane Skjøth-RasmussenDepartment of Neurosurgery, Rigshospitalet, 2100 Copenhagen, Denmark.
Jannick BrennumDepartment of Neurosurgery, Rigshospitalet, 2100 Copenhagen, Denmark.
Petra HamerlikDanish Cancer Society, 2100 Copenhagen, Denmark.
Hans Skovgaard PoulsenDepartment of Radiation Biology, Rigshospitalet, 2100 Copenhagen, Denmark.
Ulrik LassenDepartment of Oncology, Rigshospitalet, 2100 Copenhagen, Denmark.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as

base-paircell-free DNAfragment lengthglioblastomaliquid biopsy

Identifiers

PMID31320993
PMCPMC6633897

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.