Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31320930›Full record

ArticleTherapeutic advances in gastroenterology2019

Current status of first- and second-line

Hideki Mori, Hidekazu Suzuki, Fumio Omata, Tatsuhiro Masaoka, Daisuke Asaoka, Kohei Kawakami, Shigeaki Mizuno, Naoto Kurihara, Akihito Nagahara, Nobuhiro Sakaki and 13 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Therapeutic advances in gastroenterology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Guideline
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Helicobacter pylori Management in Older Adults: Current Perspectives From Japan.The Korean journal of helicobacter and upper gastrointestinal research · 2026
    Review
  8. TargetingJournal of clinical biochemistry and nutrition · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. The efficacy and safety of Vonoprazan and Tegoprazan inTherapeutic advances in gastroenterology · 2025
    Article
  11. Clinical evaluation of a real-time PCR assay for diagnosis ofInternational journal of clinical and experimental pathology · 2024
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Real-world outcomes associated with vonoprazan-basedTherapeutic advances in gastroenterology · 2023
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Increasing trend ofJournal of clinical biochemistry and nutrition · 2022
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Treatment of refractoryFrontiers in microbiology · 2022
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

23 authors.

Hideki MoriTokyo Hp Study Group, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8830-4671
Hidekazu SuzukiDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Tokai University School of Medicine, 143 Shimokasuya, Isehara, Kanagawa, 259-1193, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3855-3140
Fumio OmataTokyo Hp Study Group, Tokyo, Japan.
Tatsuhiro MasaokaTokyo Hp Study Group, Tokyo, Japan.
Daisuke AsaokaTokyo Hp Study Group, Tokyo, Japan.
Kohei KawakamiTokyo Hp Study Group, Tokyo, Japan.
Shigeaki MizunoTokyo Hp Study Group, Tokyo, Japan.
Naoto KuriharaTokyo Hp Study Group, Tokyo, Japan.
Akihito NagaharaTokyo Hp Study Group, Tokyo, Japan.
Nobuhiro SakakiTokyo Hp Study Group, Tokyo, Japan.
Masayoshi ItoTokyo Hp Study Group, Tokyo, Japan.
Yo KawamuraTokyo Hp Study Group, Tokyo, Japan.
Masayuki SuzukiTokyo Hp Study Group, Tokyo, Japan.
Yuji ShimadaTokyo Hp Study Group, Tokyo, Japan.
Hitoshi SasakiTokyo Hp Study Group, Tokyo, Japan.
Takeshi MatsuhisaTokyo Hp Study Group, Tokyo, Japan.
Akira ToriiTokyo Hp Study Group, Tokyo, Japan.
Toshihiro NishizawaTokyo Hp Study Group, Tokyo, Japan.
Tetsuya MineTokyo Hp Study Group, Tokyo, Japan.
Toshifumi OhkusaTokyo Hp Study Group, Tokyo, Japan.
Takashi KawaiTokyo Hp Study Group, Tokyo, Japan.
Kengo TokunagaTokyo Hp Study Group, Tokyo, Japan.
Shin'ichi TakahashiTokyo Hp Study Group, Tokyo, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe environment surrounding

methodsWe collected data from 20 hospitals in the Tokyo metropolitan area on patients who received first-line eradication therapy with a proton-pump inhibitor (PPI)/P-CAB, amoxicillin, and clarithromycin for 1 week and second-line eradication therapy with a PPI/P-CAB, amoxicillin, and metronidazole for 1 week from 2013 to 2018. The annual eradication rate and associated factors for successful eradication were analyzed.

resultsWe collected data of 4097 and 3572 patients in the first- and second-line eradication therapies, respectively. The eradication rate decreased from 2013 to 2014 and increased again from 2015 to 2018 with the first-line therapy [the eradication rates in 2013, 2014, 2015, 2016, 2017 and 2018 were 71.8%, 63.7%, 78.5%, 84.6%, 89.7 and 90.1%, respectively, in the per protocol (PP)]. The second-line eradication rates were 90.0%, 82.6%, 88.8%, 87.5%, 91.8% and 90.1% in 2013, 2014, 2015, 2016, 2017 and 2018, respectively, in PP. Vonoprazan was an independent factor for successful eradication in not only first-line, but also second-line eradication. Age over 75 years was an independent factor for eradication failure in both first- and second-line eradication therapies.

conclusionThe eradication rate improved from 2015 to 2018 with the first-line therapy because of the introduction of vonoprazan in the market. The eradication rates with first- and second-line regimens in elderly patients were lower than those in younger patients.

Indexed as

amoxicillinclarithromycinHelicobacter pylorimetronidazolevonoprazan

Identifiers

PMID31320930
PMCPMC6611030

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.