Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31320785›Full record

ArticleFood quality and preference2018

Sweet liker status in children and adults: Consequences for beverage intake in adults.

Nicole L Garneau, Tiffany M Nuessle, Barbara J Mendelsberg, Stephanie Shepard, Robin M Tucker

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Food quality and preference, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Parsing Intra- and Inter-Individual Covariation Between the Sensory Attributes and Appeal of E-Cigarettes: Associations and Gender Differences.Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco · 2022
    Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Nicole L GarneauDenver Museum of Nature & Science, 2001 Colorado Blvd, Denver, CO 80205 United States.
Tiffany M NuessleDenver Museum of Nature & Science, 2001 Colorado Blvd, Denver, CO 80205 United States.
Barbara J MendelsbergDenver Museum of Nature & Science, 2001 Colorado Blvd, Denver, CO 80205 United States.
Stephanie ShepardDenver Museum of Nature & Science, 2001 Colorado Blvd, Denver, CO 80205 United States.
Robin M TuckerDepartment of Food Science and Human Nutrition, 2110 S. Anthony Hall, 474 S. Shaw Ln, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824, United States.

Funding

More than just a taste of citizen scienceR25OD021909 · OD · DENVER MUSEUM OF NATURE AND SCIENCE · PI GARNEAU, NICOLE · 2016 to 2017
$527k
More than just a taste of citizen scienceR25GM129214 · NIGMS · DENVER MUSEUM OF NATURE AND SCIENCE · PI DEMBOSKI, JOHN R, GARNEAU, NICOLE · 2018 to 2019
$507k
NIGMS NIH HHS R25 GM129214NIH HHS R25 OD021909
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Different patterns of sweet liking exist. For some, liking increases as concentration increases up to a point at which it typically plateaus. These individuals are referred to as sweet likers. How sweet likers' beverage intake, especially sugar sweetened beverage intake, differs from sweet dislikers' beverage intake is not well characterized. A total of 953 visitors (650 adults; 62.0% women; 303 children; 58.7% girls) to the Denver Museum of Nature & Science rated the taste intensity and liking of 5 sucrose solutions that spanned concentrations typically encountered in sugar-sweetened beverages (0.0-13.7% w/v) using visual analog scales. Beverage intake by adults was quantified using the validated BEVQ-15 questionnaire. Among adults, hierarchical cluster analysis identified three clusters of liking patterns (likers, dislikers, and neutrals). Among children, two clusters of liking patterns were identified (likers and dislikers). For both adults and children, BMI, percent body fat, age, and sex did not differ between clusters. Concentration by cluster interaction effects were observed for both adults and children. Adult sweet likers consumed more energy from all beverages, more sweetened juice and tea, and less water than those in other clusters. Sweet liker status may be a useful predictor of increased energy intake from beverages, but prospective trials are necessary to confirm this utility.

Indexed as

AdultsBeveragesChildrenSugar-sweetened beveragesSweetnessSweet preferenceSweet taste

Identifiers

PMID31320785
PMCPMC6638566

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.