Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31320723›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2019

Host specificity drives genetic structure in a freshwater mussel.

Sebastian Wacker, Bjørn Mejdell Larsen, Sten Karlsson, Kjetil Hindar

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Parasitic mussels induce upstream movement in their fish hosts: early evidence of extended phenotype.Behavioral ecology : official journal of the International Society for Behavioral Ecology
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Sebastian WackerNorwegian Institute for Nature Research (NINA), P.O. Box 5685 Torgarden, N-7485, Trondheim, Norway. Sebastian.wacker@nina.no.
Bjørn Mejdell LarsenNorwegian Institute for Nature Research (NINA), P.O. Box 5685 Torgarden, N-7485, Trondheim, Norway.
Sten KarlssonNorwegian Institute for Nature Research (NINA), P.O. Box 5685 Torgarden, N-7485, Trondheim, Norway.
Kjetil HindarNorwegian Institute for Nature Research (NINA), P.O. Box 5685 Torgarden, N-7485, Trondheim, Norway.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Parasites often depend on their hosts for long distance transport, and genetic population structure can be strongly affected by host specificity and dispersal. Freshwater pearl mussel (Margaritifera margaritifera) populations have previously been found to naturally infest either primarily Atlantic salmon ('salmon-mussel') or exclusively brown trout ('trout-mussel') across a wide geographic range. Here, we experimentally test whether this intraspecific variation in natural infestation can be explained by host specificity in freshwater pearl mussel. Our experiments show that when both host species were exposed to larvae from salmon- and trout-mussel respectively, salmon-mussel larvae almost never infested brown trout and vice versa. This suggests that host specificity can explain variation in natural infestation among the studied freshwater pearl mussel populations. Host specificity provides a link to the species' variable population genetic structure, as mussel populations limited to Atlantic salmon, the host with stronger dispersal, show higher genetic diversity and weaker differentiation than populations limited to brown trout as host.

Indexed as

AnimalsBivalviaFish DiseasesFresh WaterGenetics, PopulationGenetic StructuresHost-Parasite InteractionsHost SpecificitySalmo salarSeafoodTrout

Identifiers

PMID31320723
PMCPMC6639377

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.