Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31320694›Full record

Trial reportInternational journal of obesity (2005)2019

Child and adult snack food intake in response to manipulated pre-packaged snack item quantity/variety and snack box size: a population-based randomized trial.

Jessica A Kerr, Pauline W Jansen, Fiona K Mensah, Kay Gibbons, Tim S Olds, John B Carlin, Susan A Clifford, David Burgner, Lisa Gold, Louise A Baur and 1 more

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in International journal of obesity (2005), 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Jessica A KerrMurdoch Children's Research Institute, Parkville, VIC, Australia. jessica.kerr@mcri.edu.au.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3150-4047
Pauline W JansenMurdoch Children's Research Institute, Parkville, VIC, Australia.
Fiona K MensahMurdoch Children's Research Institute, Parkville, VIC, Australia.
Kay GibbonsMurdoch Children's Research Institute, Parkville, VIC, Australia.
Tim S OldsMurdoch Children's Research Institute, Parkville, VIC, Australia.
John B CarlinMurdoch Children's Research Institute, Parkville, VIC, Australia.
Susan A CliffordMurdoch Children's Research Institute, Parkville, VIC, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2678-9439
David BurgnerMurdoch Children's Research Institute, Parkville, VIC, Australia.
Lisa GoldMurdoch Children's Research Institute, Parkville, VIC, Australia.
Louise A BaurDiscipline of Child and Adolescent Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Melissa WakeMurdoch Children's Research Institute, Parkville, VIC, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesSnacks contribute to overconsumption of energy-dense foods and thence obesity. Previous studies in this area are limited by self-reported data and small samples. In a large population-based cohort of parent-child dyads, we investigated how modification of pre-packaged snack food, i.e. (a) item quantity and variety, and (b) dishware (boxed container) size affected intake.

methodsDesign: Randomized trial nested within the cross-sectional Child Health CheckPoint of the Longitudinal Study of Australian Children, clustered by day of visit. SAMPLE: 1299 11-12 year olds, 1274 parents. EXPOSURE: 2 × 2 manipulation of snack box container size and item quantity/variety: (1) small box, few items, (2) large box, few items, (3) small box, more items, (4) large box, more items. PROCEDURE: Participants received a snack box during a 15 min break within their 3.5 h visit; any snacks remaining were weighed. OUTCOMES: Consumed quantity (grams) and energy intake (kilojoules). ANALYSES: Unadjusted linear regression.

resultsChildren who were offered a greater quantity and variety of snack items consumed considerably more energy and a slightly higher food mass (main effect for energy intake: 349 kJ, 95% CI 282-416, standardized mean difference (effect size) 0.66; main effect for mass: 10 g, 95% CI 3-17, effect size 0.17). In contrast, manipulating box size had little effect on child consumption, and neither box size nor quantity/variety of items consistently affected adults' consumption.

conclusionIn children, reducing the number and variety of snack food items available may be a more fruitful intervention than focusing on container or dishware size. Effects observed among adults were small, although we could not exclude social desirability bias in adults aware of observation.

Indexed as

SnacksAdultAustraliaBody Mass IndexChildCross-Sectional StudiesEnergy IntakeFeeding BehaviorFemaleFood PackagingFood PreferencesHumansLongitudinal StudiesMaleNutritive ValueParents

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.