Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31320693›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2019

Emergence of hierarchical organization in memory for random material.

Michelangelo Naim, Mikhail Katkov, Stefano Recanatesi, Misha Tsodyks

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. The Penn Electrophysiology of Encoding and Retrieval Study.Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition · 2024
    Article
  3. Contextual inference in learning and memory.Trends in cognitive sciences · 2023
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Free recall scaling laws and short-term memory effects in a latching attractor network.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Michelangelo NaimDepartment of Neurobiology, Weizmann Institute of Science, Rehovot, 76000, Israel.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4419-9301
Mikhail KatkovDepartment of Neurobiology, Weizmann Institute of Science, Rehovot, 76000, Israel.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9532-8484
Stefano RecanatesiDepartment of Physiology and Biophysics, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, 98195, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3576-9261
Misha TsodyksDepartment of Neurobiology, Weizmann Institute of Science, Rehovot, 76000, Israel. misha@weizmann.ac.il.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5661-4349

Funding

Associative Processes in Episodic MemoryR01MH055687 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI KAHANA, MICHAEL JACOB · 2002 to 2024
$7.9M
MATHEMATICAL MODELS OF HUMAN MEMORYR29MH055687 · NIMH · BRANDEIS UNIVERSITY · PI KAHANA, MICHAEL JACOB · 1997 to 2001
$218k
NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH055687NIMH NIH HHS R29 MH055687
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Structured information is easier to remember and recall than random one. In real life, information exhibits multi-level hierarchical organization, such as clauses, sentences, episodes and narratives in language. Here we show that multi-level grouping emerges even when participants perform memory recall experiments with random sets of words. To quantitatively probe brain mechanisms involved in memory structuring, we consider an experimental protocol where participants perform 'final free recall' (FFR) of several random lists of words each of which was first presented and recalled individually. We observe a hierarchy of grouping organizations of FFR, most notably many participants sequentially recalled relatively long chunks of words from each list before recalling words from another list. Moreover, participants who exhibited strongest organization during FFR achieved highest levels of performance. Based on these results, we develop a hierarchical model of memory recall that is broadly compatible with our findings. Our study shows how highly controlled memory experiments with random and meaningless material, when combined with simple models, can be used to quantitatively probe the way meaningful information can efficiently be organized and processed in the brain.

Indexed as

Models, TheoreticalAdolescentAdultGeneralization, PsychologicalHumansLanguageMemory, Short-TermMental RecallYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID31320693
PMCPMC6639408

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.