Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31320583›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2019

Mutagenesis of odorant coreceptor

Richard A Fandino, Alexander Haverkamp, Sonja Bisch-Knaden, Jin Zhang, Sascha Bucks, Tu Anh Thi Nguyen, Katrin Schröder, Achim Werckenthin, Jürgen Rybak, Monika Stengl and 3 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 46 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
46citing papers in PubMed
8.5field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

46 citing papers in PubMed, 117 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Molecular bases of insect odorant receptor function: specificity and evolution.Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society · 2026
    Review
  3. Emerging tools to advance neuroethology in butterflies and moths.Journal of comparative physiology. A, Neuroethology, sensory, neural, and behavioral physiology · 2026
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Seed Fatty Acids Modify Oviposition ofPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  9. Classification of Odor-Derived Electroantennograms with Machine Learning.Integrative organismal biology (Oxford, England) · 2025
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. IPS (In-Plant System) Delivery of Double-StrandedInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. SympatricFrontiers in cellular neuroscience · 2023
    Article
  19. Proceedings. Biological sciences · 2022
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Richard A FandinoDepartment of Evolutionary Neuroethology, Max Planck Institute for Chemical Ecology, D-07745 Jena, Germany; rfandino@ice.mpg.de hansson@ice.mpg.de.ORCID 0000-0003-2442-2681
Alexander HaverkampDepartment of Evolutionary Neuroethology, Max Planck Institute for Chemical Ecology, D-07745 Jena, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-3512-9659
Sonja Bisch-KnadenDepartment of Evolutionary Neuroethology, Max Planck Institute for Chemical Ecology, D-07745 Jena, Germany.
Jin ZhangDepartment of Evolutionary Neuroethology, Max Planck Institute for Chemical Ecology, D-07745 Jena, Germany.
Sascha BucksDepartment of Evolutionary Neuroethology, Max Planck Institute for Chemical Ecology, D-07745 Jena, Germany.
Tu Anh Thi NguyenDepartment of Evolutionary Neuroethology, Max Planck Institute for Chemical Ecology, D-07745 Jena, Germany.
Katrin SchröderDepartment of Animal Physiology, University of Kassel, D-34132 Kassel, Germany.
Achim WerckenthinDepartment of Animal Physiology, University of Kassel, D-34132 Kassel, Germany.
Jürgen RybakDepartment of Evolutionary Neuroethology, Max Planck Institute for Chemical Ecology, D-07745 Jena, Germany.
Monika StenglDepartment of Animal Physiology, University of Kassel, D-34132 Kassel, Germany.
Markus KnadenDepartment of Evolutionary Neuroethology, Max Planck Institute for Chemical Ecology, D-07745 Jena, Germany.
Bill S HanssonDepartment of Evolutionary Neuroethology, Max Planck Institute for Chemical Ecology, D-07745 Jena, Germany; rfandino@ice.mpg.de hansson@ice.mpg.de.
Ewald Große-WildeDepartment of Evolutionary Neuroethology, Max Planck Institute for Chemical Ecology, D-07745 Jena, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-3760-9835
Max Planck Institute for Chemical Ecology · DEUniversity of Kassel · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The hawkmoth

Indexed as

AnimalsCRISPR-Cas SystemsFeeding BehaviorFemaleInsect ProteinsMaleManducaOvipositionReceptors, OdorantInsect ProteinsReceptors, OdorantCRISPR-Cas9insect olfactioninsect–plant interactionsManduca sextaOrco

Identifiers

PMID31320583
PMCPMC6681710
OpenAlexW2963102705

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.