Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31320492›Full record

ArticleOccupational and environmental medicine2019

Dermatitis among workers in Ontario: results from the Occupational Disease Surveillance System.

Sharara Shakik, Victoria Arrandale, Dorothy Linn Holness, Jill S MacLeod, Christopher B McLeod, Alice Peter, Paul A Demers

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Occupational and environmental medicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Incidence of occupational contact dermatitis in healthcare workers: a systematic review.Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology : JEADV · 2021
    Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Sharara ShakikOccupational Cancer Research Centre, Cancer Care Ontario, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-8341-2910
Victoria ArrandaleOccupational Cancer Research Centre, Cancer Care Ontario, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Dorothy Linn HolnessDalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Jill S MacLeodOccupational Cancer Research Centre, Cancer Care Ontario, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Christopher B McLeodSchool of Population and Public Health, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Alice PeterPopulation Health and Prevention, Cancer Care Ontario, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Paul A DemersOccupational Cancer Research Centre, Cancer Care Ontario, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Cancer Care Ontario · CAUniversity of Toronto · CASt. Michael's Hospital · CAUniversity of British Columbia · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesDermatitis is the most common occupational skin disease, and further evidence is needed regarding preventable risk factors. The Occupational Disease Surveillance System (ODSS) derived from administrative data was used to investigate dermatitis risk among industry and occupation groups in Ontario.

methodsODSS cohort members were identified from Workplace Safety and Insurance Board (WSIB) accepted lost time claims. A case was defined as having ≥2 dermatitis physician billing claims during a 12-month period within 3 years of cohort entry. A 3-year look-back period prior to cohort entry was used to exclude prevalent cases without a WSIB claim. Workers were followed for 3 years or until dermatitis diagnosis, age 65 years, emigration, death or end of follow-up (31 December 2016), whichever occurred first. Age-adjusted and sex-adjusted Cox proportional hazard models estimated HRs and 95% CIs. The risk of dermatitis was explored using a job exposure matrix that identifies exposure to asthmagens, many of which also cause contact dermatitis.

resultsAmong 597 401 workers, 23 843 cases of new-onset dermatitis were identified. Expected elevated risks were observed among several groups including furniture and fixture industries, food and beverage preparation and chemicals, petroleum, rubber, plastic and related materials processing occupations and workers exposed to metal working fluids and organic solvents. Decreased risk was observed among farmers, nurses and construction industries, and occupations exposed to latex and indoor cleaning products.

conclusionsODSS can contribute to occupational dermatitis surveillance in Ontario by identifying occupational groups at risk of dermatitis that can then be prioritised for prevention activities.

Indexed as

IndustryOccupationsAdolescentAdultAgedCohort StudiesDermatitis, OccupationalFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedOccupational DiseasesOccupational ExposureOntarioPopulation SurveillanceProportional Hazards Modelsdermatitisoccupational diseaseoccupational exposureOntariosurveillance

Identifiers

PMID31320492
PMCPMC6824611
OpenAlexW2963263951

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.