Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31320397›Full record

ArticleTobacco control2020

Waterpipe (hookah) tobacco use in pregnancy: use, preferences and perceptions of flavours.

Laura Stroud, Erika Werner, Kristen Matteson, Michael Carey, Gideon St Helen, Thomas Eissenberg, Lori A J Scott-Sheldon

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Tobacco control, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. High Rates of Menthol Cigarette Use Among Pregnant Smokers: Preliminary Findings and Call for Future Research.Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco · 2020
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Laura StroudPsychiatry and Human Behavior, Brown University Warren Alpert Medical School, Providence, Rhode Island, USA Laura_Stroud@brown.edu Lori_Scott-Sheldon@brown.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-2138-968X
Erika WernerObstetrics and Gynecology, Brown University Warren Alpert Medical School, Providence, Rhode Island, USA.
Kristen MattesonObstetrics and Gynecology, Brown University Warren Alpert Medical School, Providence, Rhode Island, USA.
Michael CareyPsychiatry and Human Behavior, Brown University Warren Alpert Medical School, Providence, Rhode Island, USA.
Gideon St HelenDivision of Clinical Pharmacology, Department of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA.
Thomas EissenbergCenter for the Study of Tobacco Products, Department of Psychology, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, Virginia, USA.
Lori A J Scott-SheldonPsychiatry and Human Behavior, Brown University Warren Alpert Medical School, Providence, Rhode Island, USA Laura_Stroud@brown.edu Lori_Scott-Sheldon@brown.edu.

Funding

Project 4: Using a prospective cohort survey to test population-level predictions generated by Projects 1-3U54DA036105 · NIDA · VIRGINIA COMMONWEALTH UNIVERSITY · PI COBB, CAROLINE O · 2018 to 2022
$20.8M
Impact of Flavors and Design Features on Patterns of Waterpipe Use and Toxicity in Pregnant MothersR01DA042484 · NIDA · MIRIAM HOSPITAL · PI STROUD, LAURA R · 2016 to 2018
$1.6M
NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA042484NIDA NIH HHS U54 DA036105
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveWaterpipe tobacco (WPT; hookah) use is common in pregnant and reproductive-age women. Sweet flavours contribute to the appeal of WPT and are a potential regulatory target. This study investigated use, preferences and perceptions of WPT flavours in pregnant WPT users, and the impact of flavour preferences on preconception/prenatal WPT use and exposure biomarkers.

methods58 pregnant WPT users (mean age=27 years) completed a detailed interview regarding their WPT flavours use, preferences and perceptions. Biomarkers of nicotine and carcinogen exposure (eg, cotinine, benzene, butadiene) were also collected.

results55% of participants were dual/poly WPT users (ie, reported use of one or more other tobacco products in addition to WPT). Pregnant WPT users reported nearly exclusive use of flavoured WPT, with greater use of menthol/mint (68%) followed by fruit flavours (48%) (p<0.001), and greater preferences for fruit followed by menthol/mint flavours (ps<0.05). Harm perceptions did not differ among flavours. Compared with dual/poly WPT users, WPT-only users reported more total WPT use events, greater use of and preference for menthol/mint flavoured WPT (ps<0.001), and decreased exposure biomarkers (ps≤0.040). Preference for menthol/mint and fruit flavours predicted more flavoured WPT use events during preconception and pregnancy; preference for menthol/mint predicted detectable cotinine and benzene levels but not butadiene.

conclusionsThis is the first study of WPT flavour use, preferences and perceptions in pregnant women. Use of and preference for menthol/mint and fruit WPT flavours in this vulnerable population could be considered in regulating WPT flavours to protect the health of women and children.

Indexed as

Smoking Water PipesAdultBiomarkersCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleFlavoring AgentsHumansInterviews as TopicPerceptionPregnancyTobacco, WaterpipeWater Pipe SmokingYoung AdultBiomarkersFlavoring Agentsbiomarkersflavorhookahpreferencespregnancywaterpipe

Identifiers

PMID31320397
PMCPMC6980448

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.