ArticleBiology open2019
Effects of fish caudal fin sweep angle and kinematics on thrust production during low-speed thunniform swimming.
Article in Biology open, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.
- Numerical Study on the Hydrodynamic Performance of a Flexible Caudal Fin with Different Trailing-Edge Shapes.Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Thrust Improvement of a Biomimetic Robotic Fish by Using a Deformable Caudal Fin.Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Scombrid fish lunate caudal fins are characterized by a wide range of sweep angles. Scombrid that have small sweep-angle caudal fins move at higher swimming speeds, suggesting that smaller angles produce more thrust. Furthermore, scombrids occasionally use high angles of attack (AoA) suggesting this also has some thrust benefit. This work examined the hypothesis that a smaller sweep angle and higher AoA improved thrust in swimmers by experimentally analyzing a robophysical model. The robophysical model was tested in a water tunnel at speeds between 0.35 and 0.7 body lengths per second. Three swept caudal fins were analyzed at three different AoA, three different freestream velocities, and four different Strouhal numbers, for a total of 108 cases. Results demonstrated that the fin with the largest sweep angle of 50° resulted in lower thrust production than the 40° and 30° fins, especially at higher Strouhal numbers. Larger AoA up to 25° increased thrust production at the higher Strouhal numbers, but at lower Strouhal numbers, produced less thrust. Differences in thrust production due to fin sweep angle and AoA were attributed to the variation in spanwise flow and leading edge vortex dynamics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.