Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31320356›Full record

Observational studyBMJ open2019

Development of a point of care system for automated coma prognosis: a prospective cohort study protocol.

John F Connolly, James P Reilly, Alison Fox-Robichaud, Patrick Britz, Stefanie Blain-Moraes, Ranil Sonnadara, Cindy Hamielec, Adianes Herrera-Díaz, Rober Boshra

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in BMJ open, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03826407 (Development of a Point of Care System for Automated Coma Prognosis - A Prospective Cohort Study), which is not on this map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03826407 unknown statusnot on this map

Development of a Point of Care System for Automated Coma Prognosis - A Prospective Cohort Study

TypeobservationalSponsorMcMaster UniversityRan2019 to 2023Enrolled33ConditionsComa, Disorder of Consciousness, Minimally Conscious State, Vegetative State
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

John F ConnollySchool of Biomedical Engineering, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-8869-5369
James P ReillySchool of Biomedical Engineering, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
Alison Fox-RobichaudDepartment of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-9912-3606
Patrick BritzBrain Vision Solutions, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
Stefanie Blain-MoraesSchool of Physical and Occupational Therapy, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
Ranil SonnadaraSchool of Biomedical Engineering, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
Cindy HamielecDepartment of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
Adianes Herrera-DíazARiEAL Research Centre, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
Rober BoshraSchool of Biomedical Engineering, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-2925-199X
MaRS · CAHamilton Health Sciences · CABrain Canada Foundation · CAMcGill University · CAMcMaster University · CA

Funding

CIHR CPG158287
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionComa is a deep state of unconsciousness that can be caused by a variety of clinical conditions. Traditional tests for coma outcome prediction are based mainly on a set of clinical observations. Recently, certain event-related potentials (ERPs), which are transient electroencephalogram (EEG) responses to auditory, visual or tactile stimuli, have been introduced as useful predictors of a positive coma outcome (ie, emergence). However, such tests require the skills of clinical neurophysiologists, who are not commonly available in many clinical settings. Additionally, none of the current standard clinical approaches have sufficient predictive accuracies to provide definitive prognoses.

objectiveThe objective of this study is to develop improved machine learning procedures based on EEG/ERP for determining emergence from coma. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: Data will be collected from 50 participants in coma. EEG/ERP data will be recorded for 24 consecutive hours at a maximum of five time points spanning 30 days from the date of recruitment to track participants' progression. The study employs paradigms designed to elicit brainstem potentials, middle-latency responses, N100, mismatch negativity, P300 and N400. In the case of patient emergence, data are recorded on that occasion to form an additional basis for comparison. A relevant data set will be developed from the testing of 20 healthy controls, each spanning a 15-hour recording period in order to formulate a baseline. Collected data will be used to develop an automated procedure for analysis and detection of various ERP components that are salient to prognosis. Salient features extracted from the ERP and resting-state EEG will be identified and combined to give an accurate indicator of prognosis. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This study is approved by the Hamilton Integrated Research Ethics Board (project number 4840). Results will be disseminated through peer-reviewed journal articles and presentations at scientific conferences. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT03826407.

Indexed as

Point-of-Care SystemsBrainComaElectroencephalographyEvoked PotentialsHumansMachine LearningPrognosisProspective StudiesResearch Designneurological injuryneurophysiology

Identifiers

PMID31320356
PMCPMC6661548
OpenAlexW2957853081

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.