Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31320353›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2019

Evaluation of a personalised adherence intervention to improve photoprotection in adults with Xeroderma Pigmentosum (XP): protocol for the trial of XPAND.

Jessica Walburn, Sam Norton, Robert Sarkany, Kirby Sainsbury, Vera Araújo-Soares, Myfanwy Morgan, Martha Canfield, Lesley Foster, Jakob Heydenreich, Paul McCrone and 4 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03445052 (The XPAND Evaluation of a Personalised Adherence Intervention to Improve Photoprotection Behaviour in Adults With Xeroderma Pigmentosum), which is not on this map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 41% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03445052 nacompletednot on this map

The XPAND Evaluation of a Personalised Adherence Intervention to Improve Photoprotection Behaviour in Adults With Xeroderma Pigmentosum (XP): Randomised Controlled Trial.

TypeinterventionalSponsorGuy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation TrustRan2018 to 2020Enrolled15ConditionsXeroderma PigmentosumArmsXPAND
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Jessica WalburnSchool of Cancer and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Faculty of Life Sciences and Medicine, King's College London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-7396-0182
Sam NortonHealth Psychology Section, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK.
Robert SarkanyNational Xeroderma Pigmentosum Service, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Kirby SainsburyFaculty of Medical Sciences, Institute of Health and Society, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.
Vera Araújo-SoaresFaculty of Medical Sciences, Institute of Health and Society, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.
Myfanwy MorganSchool of Cancer and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Faculty of Life Sciences and Medicine, King's College London, London, UK.
Martha CanfieldHealth Psychology Section, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK.
Lesley FosterNational Xeroderma Pigmentosum Service, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Jakob HeydenreichDepartment of Dermatology, Bispebjerg Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Paul McCroneHealth Service & Population Research Department, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, UK.
Adrian ManderMRC Biostatistics Unit, School of Clinical Medicine, Cambridge Institute of Public Health, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Falko F SniehottaFaculty of Medical Sciences, Institute of Health and Society, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.
Hans Christian WulfDepartment of Dermatology, Bispebjerg Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark.
John WeinmanSchool of Cancer and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Faculty of Life Sciences and Medicine, King's College London, London, UK.
King's College London · GBNewcastle University · GBBispebjerg Hospital · DKGuy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust · GBUniversity of Cambridge · GB

Funding

Department of Health RP-PG-1212-20009
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionPoor adherence to photoprotection for people with xeroderma pigmentosum (XP) can be life-threatening. A randomised controlled trial (RCT) is being conducted to test the efficacy of a personalised adherence intervention (XPAND) to reduce the level of ultraviolet radiation (UVR) reaching the face, by improving photoprotection activities in adults with XP. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: A two-armed parallel groups RCT, where we randomised 24 patients with suboptimal adherence to either an intervention group who received XPAND in 2018 or a delayed intervention group who will receive XPAND in 2019. XPAND involves seven sessions, one-to-one with a facilitator, using behaviour change techniques and specially designed materials to target barriers to photoprotection. Following baseline assessment in April 2018 (t0) and intervention, the primary outcome will be measured across 21 consecutive days in June and July 2018 (t1). The primary outcome is the average daily UVR dose to the face (D-to-F), calculated by combining objective UVR exposure at the wrist (measured by a dosimeter) with face photoprotection activities recorded on a daily UVR protection diary. Secondary outcomes include average daily UVR D-to-F across 21 days in August (t2); psychosocial process variables measured by daily questions (t0, t1, t2) and self-report questionnaires (t0, t1, t2, December 2018 (t3)). Intervention cost-utility is assessed by service use and personal cost questionnaires (t0, t3). The delayed intervention control arm participants will complete three further assessments in April 2019 (t4) and June-July 2019 (t5), and December 2019 (t6) with dosimetry and UVR protection diary completed for 21 days at t4 and t5. A process evaluation will be conducted using mixed methods. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethical approval has been received from West London & GTAC REC 17/LO/2110. Results will be disseminated in peer-reviewed journals and at conferences. This study tests a novel intervention, which, if successful, will be integrated into routine care. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT03445052; Pre-results.

Indexed as

Health BehaviorPatient ComplianceAdultCounselingHumansRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicSunscreening AgentsSurveys and QuestionnairesUltraviolet RaysXeroderma PigmentosumSunscreening Agentsadherencebehaviour changephotoprotectionRCTxeroderma pigmentosum

Identifiers

PMID31320353
PMCPMC6661555
OpenAlexW2958641328

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.