Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31320350›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2019

The effect of smell and taste of milk during tube feeding of preterm infants (the Taste trial): a protocol for a randomised controlled trial.

Friederike Beker, Judith Macey, Helen Liley, Ian Hughes, Peter G Davis, Emily Twitchell, Susan Jacobs

Open access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Friederike BekerMater Research Institute, University of Queensland, South Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-5688-2426
Judith MaceyMater Research Institute, University of Queensland, South Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-4986-3072
Helen LileyMater Research Institute, University of Queensland, South Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-8249-9516
Ian HughesOffice for Research Governance and Development, Gold Coast University Hospital, Southport, Queensland, Australia.
Peter G DavisNeonatal Intensive Care Unit and Newborn Research, The Royal Women's Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Emily TwitchellClinical Sciences Research, Murdoch Childrens Research Institute, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.
Susan JacobsNeonatal Intensive Care Unit and Newborn Research, The Royal Women's Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
The University of Queensland · AURoyal Women's Hospital · AUGold Coast Hospital · AUMurdoch Children's Research Institute · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionSmell and taste of milk are not generally considered when tube feeding preterm infants. Preterm infants have rapid growth, particularly of the brain, and high caloric needs. Enteral feeding is often poorly tolerated which may lead to growth failure and long-term neurodevelopmental impairment. Smell and taste are strong stimulators of digestion and metabolism. We hypothesise that regular smell and taste during tube feeding will improve weight z-scores of very preterm infants at discharge from hospital. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: Taste is a randomised, unblinded two-centre trial. Infants born at <29 weeks' gestation and/or <1250 g at birth and admitted to a participating neonatal intensive care unit are eligible. Randomisation occurs before infants receive two hourly feeds for 24 hours. Infants are randomised to either smell and taste of milk with each tube feed or tube feeding without the provision of smell and taste. The primary outcome is weight z-score at discharge. Secondary outcomes include: days to full enteral feeds, duration of parenteral nutrition, rate of late-onset sepsis, post menstrual age at removal of nasogastric tube and at discharge from hospital, anthropometric data and neurodevelopmental outcomes at 2 years of corrected age. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Human Research Ethics Committees of Mater Misericordiae (trial reference number: HREC/16/MHS/112) and the Royal Women's Hospital (trial reference number: 17/21) last approved the trial protocol (version 4.2; Date: 18 December 2018) and recruitment commenced in May 2017 and November 2017, respectively. The trial results will be published in a peer-reviewed journal and will be presented at national and international conferences. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ACTRN12617000583347.

Indexed as

Enteral NutritionSmellTasteAustraliaBody WeightHumansInfant, Extremely PrematureInfant, NewbornInfant, Very Low Birth WeightIntensive Care Units, NeonatalMilk, HumanMulticenter Studies as TopicNutritional StatusRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicSurvival AnalysisTime Factorsnutritional support

Identifiers

PMID31320350
PMCPMC6661682
OpenAlexW2961248369

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.