Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31320330›Full record

ArticleCMAJ open

The impact of the introduction of a formulary into a large Canadian private drug plan: an interrupted time-series analysis.

Alan Cassels, Michael R Law

Erratum issuedOpen access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in CMAJ open. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 35% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. It's Time to Finally Kill the Zombies Comment on "Universal Pharmacare in Canada".International journal of health policy and management · 2020
    Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Alan CasselsFaculty of Human and Social Development (Cassels, Law), University of Victoria, Victoria, BC; Centre for Health Services and Policy Research (Law), School of Population and Public Health, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC cassels@uvic.ca.
Michael R LawFaculty of Human and Social Development (Cassels, Law), University of Victoria, Victoria, BC; Centre for Health Services and Policy Research (Law), School of Population and Public Health, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC.
University of British Columbia · CAUniversity of Victoria · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMost private drug plans in Canada do not use a formulary, which leads to suboptimal drug use. We studied the impact of the adoption of the public formulary by a large private health benefits plan in British Columbia.

methodsWe studied the impact of a change by members of the BC Hospital Employees' Union to have their private drug plan mirror the public formulary as of June 2013. With data from Pacific Blue Cross, we conducted a before-and-after descriptive study using interrupted time-series analysis to study changes in covered drug costs and use for 18 months preceding and following the change.

resultsOur cohort averaged 66 000 plan members and dependents over our study period. Following the implementation of the formulary, the number of prescriptions covered by the plan declined by 0.46 prescriptions per member per month (95% confidence interval -0.50 to -0.42), a decline of 23.8% at 1 year. This decreased plan spending by $1.32 million over the 18 months after the coverage change, a 49.7% decline.

interpretationThe adoption of the public formulary by a large private drug plan in BC substantially reduced drug plan expenditures and the volume of prescriptions paid for by the plan. Overall, these results suggest that carefully designed formulary changes could substantially reduce spending by private-sector drug plans on drugs that have more cost-effective therapeutic alternatives.

Identifiers

PMID31320330
PMCPMC6639096
OpenAlexW2956863200

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.