ArticleCMAJ open
Electronic cigarette exposures reported to the British Columbia Drug and Poison Information Centre: an observational case series.
Article in CMAJ open. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Opportunities and challenges in capturing severe vaping-related injuries among Canadian children and youth.Preventive medicine reports · 2023Article
- Acute injury or illness related to the inhalation of vaping aerosols among children and adolescents across Canada: A cross-sectional survey of Canadian paediatricians.Paediatrics & child health · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundElectronic nicotine delivery systems (ENDSs), including electronic cigarettes (e-cigarettes), are rapidly gaining popularity. The aim of this study was to use poison centre data to describe epidemiological trends in ENDS-related exposures.
methodsWe conducted an observational case series study using records containing both coded fields and free-text narratives from the British Columbia Drug and Poison Information Centre for all calls involving exposure to ENDS received from 2012 to 2017. We described trends in exposures and exposed people, as well as clinical effects.
resultsA total of 243 calls were recorded for 186 unique exposures to ENDS devices, e-juice, e-cigarette cartridges and other associated paraphernalia over the study period. Calls related to ENDS exposures increased nearly sixfold between 2013 and 2014 and did not decline subsequently. Exposures were most frequently documented in children aged 4 years or less (81 [43.5%]), with 58 (31.0%) in 1- and 2-year-olds. Seventy-two exposures (89%) in children aged 4 years or less were due to accidental ingestion, whereas adults aged 25 years or more called the poison centre following ENDS malfunctions (7 [23%], spills (4 [13%]) and exposure to e-juice mistaken for other substances (4 [13%]). Of the 186 exposed people, 87 (46.8%) reported symptoms.
interpretationBritish Columbia experienced a sixfold increase in ENDS-related calls to the provincial poison centre between 2012 and 2017, driven by ingestions in young children. Regulatory approaches aimed at minimizing children's access to ENDS, clear labelling of nicotine concentration, and packaging that reduces the likelihood of spills, product confusion and malfunction should be considered.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.