Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31320328›Full record

ArticleCMAJ open

Repeat adverse drug events associated with outpatient medications: a descriptive analysis of 3 observational studies in British Columbia, Canada.

Corinne M Hohl, Stephanie A Woo, Amber Cragg, Maeve E Wickham, Christine Ackerley, Frank Scheuermeyer, Diane Villanyi

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in CMAJ open. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Observational
  6. Observational
  7. Observational
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Preventable adverse drug events: Descriptive epidemiology.British journal of clinical pharmacology · 2020
    Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Corinne M HohlDepartment of Emergency Medicine (Hohl, Cragg, Scheuermeyer), University of British Columbia; Emergency Department (Hohl), Vancouver General Hospital; Centre for Clinical Epidemiology and Evaluation (Hohl, Cragg, Wickham), Vancouver Coastal Health Research Institute; Pharmaceutical Sciences (Woo), Vancouver General Hospital; School of Population and Public Health (Wickham), University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC; School of Communication (Ackerley), Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, BC; Division of Geriatrics (Villanyi), Department of Medicine, Vancouver General Hospital, Vancouver, BC chohl@mail.ubc.ca.
Stephanie A WooDepartment of Emergency Medicine (Hohl, Cragg, Scheuermeyer), University of British Columbia; Emergency Department (Hohl), Vancouver General Hospital; Centre for Clinical Epidemiology and Evaluation (Hohl, Cragg, Wickham), Vancouver Coastal Health Research Institute; Pharmaceutical Sciences (Woo), Vancouver General Hospital; School of Population and Public Health (Wickham), University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC; School of Communication (Ackerley), Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, BC; Division of Geriatrics (Villanyi), Department of Medicine, Vancouver General Hospital, Vancouver, BC.
Amber CraggDepartment of Emergency Medicine (Hohl, Cragg, Scheuermeyer), University of British Columbia; Emergency Department (Hohl), Vancouver General Hospital; Centre for Clinical Epidemiology and Evaluation (Hohl, Cragg, Wickham), Vancouver Coastal Health Research Institute; Pharmaceutical Sciences (Woo), Vancouver General Hospital; School of Population and Public Health (Wickham), University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC; School of Communication (Ackerley), Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, BC; Division of Geriatrics (Villanyi), Department of Medicine, Vancouver General Hospital, Vancouver, BC.
Maeve E WickhamDepartment of Emergency Medicine (Hohl, Cragg, Scheuermeyer), University of British Columbia; Emergency Department (Hohl), Vancouver General Hospital; Centre for Clinical Epidemiology and Evaluation (Hohl, Cragg, Wickham), Vancouver Coastal Health Research Institute; Pharmaceutical Sciences (Woo), Vancouver General Hospital; School of Population and Public Health (Wickham), University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC; School of Communication (Ackerley), Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, BC; Division of Geriatrics (Villanyi), Department of Medicine, Vancouver General Hospital, Vancouver, BC.
Christine AckerleyDepartment of Emergency Medicine (Hohl, Cragg, Scheuermeyer), University of British Columbia; Emergency Department (Hohl), Vancouver General Hospital; Centre for Clinical Epidemiology and Evaluation (Hohl, Cragg, Wickham), Vancouver Coastal Health Research Institute; Pharmaceutical Sciences (Woo), Vancouver General Hospital; School of Population and Public Health (Wickham), University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC; School of Communication (Ackerley), Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, BC; Division of Geriatrics (Villanyi), Department of Medicine, Vancouver General Hospital, Vancouver, BC.
Frank ScheuermeyerDepartment of Emergency Medicine (Hohl, Cragg, Scheuermeyer), University of British Columbia; Emergency Department (Hohl), Vancouver General Hospital; Centre for Clinical Epidemiology and Evaluation (Hohl, Cragg, Wickham), Vancouver Coastal Health Research Institute; Pharmaceutical Sciences (Woo), Vancouver General Hospital; School of Population and Public Health (Wickham), University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC; School of Communication (Ackerley), Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, BC; Division of Geriatrics (Villanyi), Department of Medicine, Vancouver General Hospital, Vancouver, BC.
Diane VillanyiDepartment of Emergency Medicine (Hohl, Cragg, Scheuermeyer), University of British Columbia; Emergency Department (Hohl), Vancouver General Hospital; Centre for Clinical Epidemiology and Evaluation (Hohl, Cragg, Wickham), Vancouver Coastal Health Research Institute; Pharmaceutical Sciences (Woo), Vancouver General Hospital; School of Population and Public Health (Wickham), University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC; School of Communication (Ackerley), Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, BC; Division of Geriatrics (Villanyi), Department of Medicine, Vancouver General Hospital, Vancouver, BC.
Simon Fraser University · CAUniversity of British Columbia · CAVancouver Coastal Health Research Institute · CAVancouver General Hospital · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAdverse drug events are an important cause of preventable emergency department visits and hospital admissions. We examined repeat adverse drug events associated with outpatient medications resulting in acute care utilization.

methodsThis descriptive analysis combined data from 3 prospective multicentre observational studies, in which clinical pharmacists and physicians independently evaluated patients who visited the emergency department for adverse drug events in 3 hospitals in British Columbia. During these studies, an independent committee adjudicated all discordant and uncertain cases using a standardized algorithm. For the current study, we retrospectively reviewed the medical and research records of all patients 19 years of age and older who had been diagnosed with an adverse drug event during the primary studies to determine the proportion of repeat events. We used multivariable logistic regression to identify factors associated with repeat events; we adjusted for clustering at the hospital level for patient-level analyses and at the patient level for event-level analyses.

resultsAmong 12 977 patients, 1178 were diagnosed with 1296 adverse drug events at the point of care. Of these events, 32.5% (421 of 1296; 95% confidence interval [CI] 29.8%-35.1%) were repeat events, of which 75.3% (317 of 421; 95% CI 71.1%-79.5%) were deemed probably or definitely preventable as re-exposure to the culprit medication or repeat withdrawal of an indicated medication was inconsistent with best medical practice. Patients presenting with repeat events were more likely to have renal failure (odds ratio [OR] 2.01; 95% CI 1.32%-3.07%) or a mental health diagnosis (OR 1.39; 95% CI 1.02%-1.88%).

interpretationA high proportion of adverse drug events were repeat events, most of which were deemed preventable. Interventions to ensure that care providers are aware of previously diagnosed adverse drug events when prescribing or dispensing need to be developed and evaluated and may reduce unintentional re-exposures to previously harmful medications.

Identifiers

PMID31320328
PMCPMC6639095
OpenAlexW2959533302

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.