Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31319892›Full record

SynthesisBMC medical education2019

Theory-based strategies for teaching evidence-based practice to undergraduate health students: a systematic review.

Mary-Anne Ramis, Anne Chang, Aaron Conway, David Lim, Judy Munday, Lisa Nissen

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMC medical education, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Undergraduate Curriculum Designed to Facilitate a Cancer Exercise Rehabilitation Program.Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2022
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Mary-Anne RamisMater Health, Evidence in Practice Unit & Queensland Centre for Evidence Based Nursing and Midwifery, A Joanna Briggs Institute Centre of Excellence, South Brisbane, QLD, 4101, Australia. m.ramis@qut.edu.au.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9453-9565
Anne ChangQueensland University of Technology, School of Nursing, Kelvin Grove Campus, Victoria Park Road, Brisbane, 4059, Australia.
Aaron ConwayPeter Munk Cardiac Centre, Toronto General Hospital, University Health Network, Lawrence S. Bloomberg Faculty of Nursing, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, M5G 2N2, Canada.
David LimSchool of Science and Health, Western Sydney University, Sydney, 2751, Australia.
Judy MundayQueensland University of Technology, School of Nursing, Kelvin Grove Campus, Victoria Park Road, Brisbane, 4059, Australia.
Lisa NissenQueensland University of Technology, School of Clinical Sciences, Gardens Point Campus, QLD, Brisbane, 4000, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundUndergraduate students across health professions are required to be capable users of evidence in their clinical practice after graduation. Gaining the essential knowledge and clinical behaviors for evidence-based practice can be enhanced by theory-based strategies. Limited evidence exists on the effect of underpinning undergraduate EBP curricula with a theoretical framework to support EBP competence. A systematic review was conducted to determine the effectiveness of EBP teaching strategies for undergraduate students, with specific focus on efficacy of theory-based strategies.

methodsThis review critically appraised and synthesized evidence on the effectiveness of EBP theory-based teaching strategies specifically for undergraduate health students on long or short-term change in multiple outcomes, including but not limited to, EBP knowledge and attitudes. PubMed, CINAHL, Scopus, ProQuest Health, ERIC, The Campbell Collaboration, PsycINFO were searched for published studies and The New York Academy of Medicine, ProQuest Dissertations and Mednar were searched for unpublished studies. Two independent reviewers assessed studies using the Joanna Briggs Institute Meta-Analysis of Statistics Assessment and Review Instrument.

resultsTwenty-eight studies reporting EBP teaching strategies were initially selected for review with methodological quality ranging from low to high. Studies varied in course duration, timing of delivery, population and course content. Only five included papers reported alignment with, and detail of, one or more theoretical frameworks. Theories reported included Social Cognitive Theory (one study), Roger's Diffusion of Innovation Theory (two studies) and Cognitive Apprenticeship Theory (one study). Cognitive Flexibility Theory and Cognitive Load Theory were discussed in two separate papers by the same authors. All but one study measured EBP knowledge. Mixed results were reported on EBP knowledge, attitudes and skills across the five studies.

conclusionsEBP programs for undergraduate health students require consideration of multiple domains, including clinical behaviors, attitudes and cognitive learning processes; Interventions grounded in theory were found to have a small but positive effect on EBP attitudes. The most effective theory for developing and supporting EBP capability is not able to be determined by this review therefore additional rigorous research is required.

Indexed as

Clinical CompetenceCurriculumEvidence-Based PracticeFemaleHealth OccupationsHumansMaleModels, TheoreticalStudents, Health OccupationsUnited StatesYoung AdultEBPEducationEvidence-based practiceHealth professionsSocial cognitive theoryTheory-based interventionUndergraduate

Identifiers

PMID31319892
PMCPMC6637485

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.