Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31319885›Full record

ArticleAlzheimer's research & therapy2019

Retinal thickness as potential biomarker in posterior cortical atrophy and typical Alzheimer's disease.

Jurre den Haan, Lajos Csinscik, Tom Parker, Ross W Paterson, Catherine F Slattery, Alexander Foulkes, Femke H Bouwman, Frank D Verbraak, Philip Scheltens, Tunde Peto and 5 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Alzheimer's research & therapy, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
5.6field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 58 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Ophthalmic Biomarkers for Alzheimer's Disease: A Review.Frontiers in aging neuroscience · 2021
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Jurre den HaanDepartment of Neurology, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Alzheimer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Mailbox 7057, 1007, MB, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. j.denhaan1@vumc.nl.ORCID 0000-0003-1476-5568
Lajos CsinscikCentre for Experimental Medicine, Queen's University, Belfast, UK.
Tom ParkerDementia Research Centre, UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, London, UK.
Ross W PatersonDementia Research Centre, UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, London, UK.
Catherine F SlatteryDementia Research Centre, UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, London, UK.
Alexander FoulkesDementia Research Centre, UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, London, UK.
Femke H BouwmanDepartment of Neurology, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Alzheimer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Mailbox 7057, 1007, MB, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Frank D VerbraakDepartment of Ophthalmology, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Philip ScheltensDepartment of Neurology, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Alzheimer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Mailbox 7057, 1007, MB, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Tunde PetoCentre for Experimental Medicine, Queen's University, Belfast, UK.
Imre LengyelCentre for Experimental Medicine, Queen's University, Belfast, UK.
Jonathan M SchottDementia Research Centre, UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, London, UK.
Sebastian J CrutchDementia Research Centre, UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, London, UK.
Timothy J ShakespeareDementia Research Centre, UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, London, UK.
Keir X X YongDementia Research Centre, UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, London, UK.
UK Dementia Research Institute · GBAmsterdam Neuroscience · NLQueen's University Belfast · GBAmsterdam University Medical Centers · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRetinal thickness can be measured non-invasively with optical coherence tomography (OCT) and may offer compelling potential as a biomarker for Alzheimer's disease (AD). Retinal thinning is hypothesized to be a result of retrograde atrophy and/or parallel neurodegenerative processes. Changes in the visual pathway are of particular interest in posterior cortical atrophy (PCA), the most common atypical AD phenotype predominantly affecting the parietal-occipital cortices. We therefore evaluated retinal thickness as non-invasive biomarker of neurodegeneration in well-characterized participants with posterior cortical atrophy (PCA) and typical Alzheimer's disease (tAD).

methodsRetinal thickness measures were acquired from 48 patient participants (N = 25 PCA; N = 23 tAD) fulfilling consensus diagnostic criteria and 70 age-matched controls. Participants were recruited between 2014 and 2016. All participants underwent optical coherence tomography (OCT) imaging, including measurement of peripapillary retinal nerve fiber layer (pRNFL) thickness and total macular thickness (mRT). Participants did not show evidence of any significant ophthalmological conditions. Subgroup analyses were performed in participants with available MRI and CSF measures, providing evidence of neurodegeneration and underlying AD pathology respectively.

resultsThere was no evidence of overall between-group differences in pRNFL thickness (mean PCA 98.7 ± 12.2; tAD 99.9 ± 8.7; controls 99.6 ± 10.0 μm, one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) p = 0.92) or total mRT (mean PCA 266.9 ± 16.3; tAD 267.8 ± 13.6; controls 269.3 ± 13.6 μm, one-way ANOVA p = 0.75). Similarly, subgroup analysis with MRI biomarkers (PCA = 18, tAD = 17, controls = 31) showing neurodegeneration, and CSF biomarkers (PCA = 18, tAD = 14, controls = 13) supporting underlying AD pathology did not provide evidence of overall between-group differences in pRNFL or mRT measures (all p > 0.3).

conclusionsRetinal thickness did not discriminate tAD and PCA from controls or from one another despite unequivocal differences on standard clinical, neuro-imaging and CSF measures. Findings from this well-characterized sample, including cases with PCA, do not support the hypothesis that retinal neurodegeneration, measured using conventional OCT, is a useful biomarker for AD or PCA.

Indexed as

AgedAlzheimer DiseaseAtrophyBiomarkersFemaleHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMiddle AgedOccipital LobeParietal LobeRetinaTomography, Optical CoherenceVisual PathwaysBiomarkersAlzheimer’s diseaseBiomarkerMRIOptical coherence tomographyPosterior cortical atrophyRetinal thickness

Identifiers

PMID31319885
PMCPMC6639972
OpenAlexW2963001877

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.