Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31319860›Full record

ArticleBMC medicine2019

Distinct mortality patterns at 0-2 days versus the remaining neonatal period: results from population-based assessment in the Indian state of Bihar.

Rakhi Dandona, G Anil Kumar, Debarshi Bhattacharya, Md Akbar, Yamini Atmavilas, Priya Nanda, Lalit Dandona

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Rakhi DandonaPublic Health Foundation of India, Sector 44, Institutional Area, Gurugram, National Capital Region, India. rakhi.dandona@phfi.org.
G Anil KumarPublic Health Foundation of India, Sector 44, Institutional Area, Gurugram, National Capital Region, India.
Debarshi BhattacharyaBill & Melinda Gates Foundation, India Country Office, New Delhi, India.
Md AkbarPublic Health Foundation of India, Sector 44, Institutional Area, Gurugram, National Capital Region, India.
Yamini AtmavilasBill & Melinda Gates Foundation, India Country Office, New Delhi, India.
Priya NandaBill & Melinda Gates Foundation, India Country Office, New Delhi, India.
Lalit DandonaPublic Health Foundation of India, Sector 44, Institutional Area, Gurugram, National Capital Region, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe objectives of this study were to understand the differences in mortality rate, risk factors for mortality, and cause of death distribution in three neonatal age sub-groups (0-2, 3-7, and 8-27 days) and assess the change in mortality rate with previous assessments to inform programmatic decision-making in the Indian state of Bihar, a large state with a high burden of newborn deaths.

methodsDetailed interviews were conducted in a representative sample of 23,602 live births between January and December 2016 (96.2% participation) in Bihar state. We estimated the neonatal mortality rate (NMR) for the three age sub-groups and explored the association of these deaths with a variety of risk factors using a hierarchical logistic regression model approach. Verbal autopsies were conducted using the PHMRC questionnaire and the cause of death assigned using the SmartVA automated algorithm. Change in NMR from 2011 to 2016 was estimated by comparing it with a previous assessment.

resultsThe NMR 0-2-day, 3-7-day, and 8-27-day mortality estimates in 2016 were 24.7 (95% CI 21.8-28.0), 13.2 (11.1 to 15.7), 5.8 (4.4 to 7.5), and 5.8 (4.5 to 7.5) per 1000 live births, respectively. A statistically significant reduction of 23.3% (95% CI 9.2% to 37.3) was seen in NMR from 2011 to 2016, driven by a reduction of 35.3% (95% CI 18.4% to 52.2) in 0-2-day mortality. In the final regression model, the highest odds for mortality in 0-2 days were related to the gestation period of ≤ 8 months (OR 16.5, 95% CI 11.9-22.9) followed by obstetric complications, no antiseptic cord care, and delivery at a private health facility or home. The 3-7- and 8-27-day mortality was driven by illness in the neonatal period (OR 10.33, 95% CI 6.31-16.90, and OR 4.88, 95% CI 3.13-7.61, respectively) and pregnancy with multiple foetuses (OR 5.15, 95% CI 2.39-11.10, and OR 11.77, 95% CI 6.43-21.53, respectively). Birth asphyxia (61.1%) and preterm delivery (22.1%) accounted for most of 0-2-day deaths; pneumonia (34.5%), preterm delivery (33.7%), and meningitis/sepsis (20.1%) accounted for the majority of 3-7-day deaths; meningitis/sepsis (30.6%), pneumonia (29.1%), and preterm delivery (26.2%) were the leading causes of death at 8-27 days.

conclusionsTo our knowledge, this is the first study to report a detailed neonatal epidemiology by age sub-groups for a major Indian state, which has highlighted the distinctly different mortality rate, risk factors, and causes of death at 0-2 days versus the rest of the neonatal period. Monitoring mortality at 0-2 and 3-7 days separately in the traditional early neonatal period of 0-7 days would enable more effective programming to reduce neonatal mortality.

Indexed as

Infant MortalityPerinatal DeathAdolescentAdultAge FactorsAutopsyCause of DeathFemaleHumansIndiaInfantInfant, NewbornInfant, Newborn, DiseasesLive BirthLogistic ModelsMaleBiharBirth asphyxiaDeathIndiaMeningitisNeonatal mortalityPretermRisk factorsSepsisVerbal autopsy

Identifiers

PMID31319860
PMCPMC6639919

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.