Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31319833›Full record

Observational studyBMC pulmonary medicine2019

Clinical characteristics of patients with familial idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (f-IPF).

Ekaterina Krauss, Godja Gehrken, Fotios Drakopanagiotakis, Silke Tello, Ruth C Dartsch, Olga Maurer, Anita Windhorst, Daniel von der Beck, Matthias Griese, Werner Seeger and 1 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract readMulticenter StudyObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in BMC pulmonary medicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02951416 (The European IPF Registry - an Internet-based, Pan-European Registry Linked to the European IPF Biobank), which is not on this map. Cited by 31 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02951416 active not recruitingnot on this map

The European IPF Registry - an Internet-based, Pan-European Registry Linked to the European IPF Biobank (eurIPFbank)

Typeobservational_patient_registrySponsorAndreas GuentherRan2009 to 2040Enrolled2,000ConditionsIdiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis, Idiopathic Interstitial Pneumonia, Interstitial Lung Diseases, Diffuse Parenchymal Lung DiseasesArmspatient registry (observation and biomaterial sampling)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Guideline
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Genetic Underpinnings of Pulmonary Fibrosis: An Overview.Cardiovascular & hematological agents in medicinal chemistry · 2024
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Ekaterina KraussUniversities of Giessen and Marburg Lung Center (UGMLC), Member of the German Center for Lung Research (DZL), Universities of Giessen and Marburg Lung Center (UGMLC), European IPF Registry (eurIPFreg), Klinikstrasse 36, 35392, Giessen, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8682-4294
Godja GehrkenUniversities of Giessen and Marburg Lung Center (UGMLC), Member of the German Center for Lung Research (DZL), Universities of Giessen and Marburg Lung Center (UGMLC), European IPF Registry (eurIPFreg), Klinikstrasse 36, 35392, Giessen, Germany.
Fotios DrakopanagiotakisUniversities of Giessen and Marburg Lung Center (UGMLC), Member of the German Center for Lung Research (DZL), Universities of Giessen and Marburg Lung Center (UGMLC), European IPF Registry (eurIPFreg), Klinikstrasse 36, 35392, Giessen, Germany.
Silke TelloUniversities of Giessen and Marburg Lung Center (UGMLC), Member of the German Center for Lung Research (DZL), Universities of Giessen and Marburg Lung Center (UGMLC), European IPF Registry (eurIPFreg), Klinikstrasse 36, 35392, Giessen, Germany.
Ruth C DartschAgaplesion Lung Clinic Waldhof-Elgershausen, Greifenstein, Germany.
Olga MaurerAgaplesion Lung Clinic Waldhof-Elgershausen, Greifenstein, Germany.
Anita WindhorstDepartment of Medical Statistics, Justus-Liebig-University of Giessen, Giessen, Germany.
Daniel von der BeckUniversities of Giessen and Marburg Lung Center (UGMLC), Member of the German Center for Lung Research (DZL), Universities of Giessen and Marburg Lung Center (UGMLC), European IPF Registry (eurIPFreg), Klinikstrasse 36, 35392, Giessen, Germany.
Matthias GrieseChildren University Hospital, Campus Hauner, Member of the German Center for Lung Research (DZL), Munich, Germany.
Werner SeegerUniversities of Giessen and Marburg Lung Center (UGMLC), Member of the German Center for Lung Research (DZL), Universities of Giessen and Marburg Lung Center (UGMLC), European IPF Registry (eurIPFreg), Klinikstrasse 36, 35392, Giessen, Germany.
Andreas GuentherUniversities of Giessen and Marburg Lung Center (UGMLC), Member of the German Center for Lung Research (DZL), Universities of Giessen and Marburg Lung Center (UGMLC), European IPF Registry (eurIPFreg), Klinikstrasse 36, 35392, Giessen, Germany. andreas.guenther@innere.med.uni-giessen.de.

Funding

Seventh Framework Programme n/a
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe aim of this study was to analyze the relative frequency, clinical characteristics, disease onset and progression in f-IPF vs. sporadic IPF (s-IPF).

methodsFamilial IPF index patients and their family members were recruited into the European IPF registry/biobank (eurIPFreg) at the Universities of Giessen and Marburg (UGMLC). Initially, we employed wide range criteria of f-IPF (e.g. relatives who presumably died of some kind of parenchymal lung disease). After narrowing down the search to occurrence of idiopathic interstitial pneumonia (IIP) in at least one first grade relative, 28 index patients were finally identified, prospectively interviewed and examined. Their family members were phenotyped with establishment of pedigree charts.

resultsWithin the 28 IPF families, overall 79 patients with f-IPF were identified. In the same observation period, 286 f-IIP and s-IIP patients were recruited into the eurIPFreg at our UGMLC sites, corresponding to a familial versus s-IPF of 9.8%. The both groups showed no difference in demographics (61 vs. 79% males), smoking history, and exposure to any environmental triggers known to cause lung fibrosis. The f-IPF group differed by an earlier age at the onset of the disease (55.4 vs. 63.2 years; p < 0.001). On average, the f-IPF patients presented a significantly milder extent of functional impairment at the time point of inclusion vs. the s-IPF group (FVC 75% pred. vs. FVC 62% pred., p = 0.011). In contrast, the decline in FVC was found to be faster in the f-IPF vs. the s-IPF group (4.94% decline in 6 months in f-IPF vs. 2.48% in s-IPF, p = 0.12). The average age of death in f-IPF group was 67 years vs. 71.8 years in s-IPF group (p = 0.059). The f-IIP group displayed diverse inheritance patterns, mostly autosomal-dominant with variable penetrance. In the f-IPF, the younger generations showed a tendency for earlier manifestation of IPF vs. the older generation (58 vs. 66 years, p = 0.013).

conclusionsThe 28 f-IPF index patients presented an earlier onset and more aggressive natural course of the disease. The disease seems to affect consecutive generations at a younger age.

trial registrationNr. NCT02951416 http://www.www.clinicaltrials.gov.

Indexed as

RegistriesAgedCross-Sectional StudiesDisease ProgressionEuropeFemaleHumansIdiopathic Interstitial PneumoniasIdiopathic Pulmonary FibrosisLungMaleMiddle AgedSurvival RateDiffuse parenchymal lung diseases (DPLD)European IPF biobank (eurIPFbank)European IPF registry (eurIPFreg)Familial idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (f-IPF)Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF)Interstitial idiopathic pneumonia (IIP)

Identifiers

PMID31319833
PMCPMC6637501

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.