Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31319826›Full record

ArticleBMC public health2019

Temporal changes in breast cancer screening coverage provided under the Brazilian National Health Service between 2008 and 2017.

Danielle Cristina Netto Rodrigues, Ruffo Freitas-Junior, Rosemar Macedo Sousa Rahal, Rosangela da Silveira Corrêa, Pollyana Alves Gouveia, João Emílio Peixoto, Edésio Martins, Leonardo Ribeiro Soares

Abstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMC public health, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. The New Coronavirus Pandemic and the Trend of Breast Cancer Diagnosis according to Age-Group: Total and Interrupted Time Series Study.Medical principles and practice : international journal of the Kuwait University, Health Science Centre · 2023
    Article
  4. COVID-19 and Breast Cancer in Brazil.International journal of public health · 2023
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Danielle Cristina Netto RodriguesBrazilian Breast Cancer Research Network, Advanced Center for Breast Diagnosis (CORA), School of Medicine, Federal University of Goiás, Primeira Avenida, s/n, Bloco II, Setor Universitário, Goiânia, Goiás, 74605-020, Brazil. daniellepsinetto@yahoo.com.br.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6044-0003
Ruffo Freitas-JuniorBrazilian Breast Cancer Research Network, Advanced Center for Breast Diagnosis (CORA), School of Medicine, Federal University of Goiás, Primeira Avenida, s/n, Bloco II, Setor Universitário, Goiânia, Goiás, 74605-020, Brazil.
Rosemar Macedo Sousa RahalBrazilian Breast Cancer Research Network, Advanced Center for Breast Diagnosis (CORA), School of Medicine, Federal University of Goiás, Primeira Avenida, s/n, Bloco II, Setor Universitário, Goiânia, Goiás, 74605-020, Brazil.
Rosangela da Silveira CorrêaBrazilian Breast Cancer Research Network, Advanced Center for Breast Diagnosis (CORA), School of Medicine, Federal University of Goiás, Primeira Avenida, s/n, Bloco II, Setor Universitário, Goiânia, Goiás, 74605-020, Brazil.
Pollyana Alves GouveiaBrazilian Breast Cancer Research Network, Advanced Center for Breast Diagnosis (CORA), School of Medicine, Federal University of Goiás, Primeira Avenida, s/n, Bloco II, Setor Universitário, Goiânia, Goiás, 74605-020, Brazil.
João Emílio PeixotoBrazilian Breast Cancer Research Network, Division of Quality Control in Ionizing Radiation, National Cancer Institute (INCA), Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil.
Edésio MartinsBrazilian Breast Cancer Research Network, Faculdade Unida de Campinas, Goiânia, Goiás, Brazil.
Leonardo Ribeiro SoaresBrazilian Breast Cancer Research Network, Advanced Center for Breast Diagnosis (CORA), School of Medicine, Federal University of Goiás, Primeira Avenida, s/n, Bloco II, Setor Universitário, Goiânia, Goiás, 74605-020, Brazil.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn Brazil, 70% of the population depends on the public healthcare system. Since early detection is considered crucial, this study aimed to evaluate temporal changes in breast cancer screening coverage provided under the Brazilian National Health Service (SUS) according to the different regions of the country between 2008 and 2017.

methodsThis ecological study analyzed data on breast cancer screening within the SUS for women aged 50-69 years. Coverage was calculated from the ratio between the number of screening tests conducted and the expected number for the target population. Joinpoint regression analysis was used to calculate annual percent changes (APC) in coverage.

resultsAround 19 million mammograms were performed in 50-69-year old women within the SUS between 2008 and 2016. The estimated APC indicates that breast cancer screening coverage increased by 14.5% annually in Brazil between 2008 and 2012 (p < 0.01), with figures stabilizing between 2012 and 2017 as shown by an APC of - 0.4% (p = 0.3). In the five geographic regions of the country, the APC initially increased, then stabilized in the north, northeast and southeast and decreased in the south and Midwest. Of the 26 states, coverage increased in seven and remained stable in six. In the other 13, there was an initial increase followed by stabilization in 11, and a reduction in coverage in two. In the Federal District, coverage remained stable throughout the study period.

conclusionEvaluation of the temporal changes in breast cancer screening coverage provided under the Brazilian National Health Service revealed an initial increase, confirming that public policies were effective, although insufficient to ensure organized screening. There appears to be a lack of uniformity between the different regions and states and this situation is highlighted in the final 5-year period, with the APC reflecting stabilization of breast cancer screening coverage.

Indexed as

AgedBrazilBreast NeoplasmsEarly Detection of CancerFemaleHumansMammographyMass ScreeningMiddle AgedNational Health ProgramsTime FactorsBrazilian National Health ServiceBreast cancerHealthcare coverageMammographyScreening programs

Identifiers

PMID31319826
PMCPMC6637648

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.