Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31319793›Full record

ArticleBMC plant biology2019

Constitutive and induced insect resistance in RNAi-mediated ultra-low gossypol cottonseed cotton.

Steffen Hagenbucher, Michael Eisenring, Michael Meissle, Keerti S Rathore, Jörg Romeis

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC plant biology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Steffen HagenbucherAgroscope, Research Division Agroecology and Environment, Reckenholzstrasse 191, 8046, Zürich, Switzerland.
Michael EisenringAgroscope, Research Division Agroecology and Environment, Reckenholzstrasse 191, 8046, Zürich, Switzerland.
Michael MeissleAgroscope, Research Division Agroecology and Environment, Reckenholzstrasse 191, 8046, Zürich, Switzerland.
Keerti S RathoreDepartment of Soil and Crop Sciences, Institute for Plant Genomics & Biotechnology, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, USA.
Jörg RomeisAgroscope, Research Division Agroecology and Environment, Reckenholzstrasse 191, 8046, Zürich, Switzerland. joerg.romeis@agroscope.admin.ch.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3652-8360
Agroscope · CHTexas A&M University · US

Funding

Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung 31003A-149794
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundBesides fibers, cotton plants also produce a large amount of seeds with a high oil and protein content. The use of these seeds is restricted by their high contents of the terpenoid gossypol, which is harmful to humans and livestock. Using a genetic engineering approach, "Ultra-low gossypol cottonseed" (ULGCS) plants were produced by knocking down an enzyme that catalyzes the formation of a precursor of gossypol. This was accomplished via RNAi-mediated silencing of the target gene using a seed-specific α-globulin promotor. Since gossypol is also a crucial defense mechanism against leaf-feeding herbivores, ULGCS plants might possess lower herbivore resistance than non-engineered plants. Therefore, we tested the constitutive and inducible direct insect resistance of two ULGCS cotton lines against the African cotton leafworm, Spodoptera littoralis.

resultThe herbivore was equally affected by both ULGCS lines and the control (Coker 312) line when feeding on fully expanded true leaves from undamaged plants and plants induced by jasmonic acid. When plants were induced by caterpillar-damage, however, S. littoralis larvae performed better on the ULGCS plants. Terpenoid analyses revealed that the ULGCS lines were equally inducible as the control plants. Levels of terpenoids were always lower in one of the two lines. In the case of cotyledons, caterpillars performed better on ULGCS cotton than on conventional cotton. This was likely caused by reduced levels of gossypol in ULGCS cotyledons.

conclusionDespite those effects, the insect resistance of ULGSC cotton can be considered as largely intact and the plants may, therefore, be an interesting alternative to conventional cotton varieties.

Indexed as

AnimalsCotyledonGene Knockdown TechniquesGossypiumGossypolHerbivoryLarvaPlant LeavesSpodopteraGossypolGenetically modified cropsGlandless cottonGossypium hirsutumGossypolSpodoptera littoralisTAM66274ULGCS

Identifiers

PMID31319793
PMCPMC6639952
OpenAlexW2960927182

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.