ArticleBMC medical research methodology2019
Readiness assessment for pragmatic trials (RAPT): a model to assess the readiness of an intervention for testing in a pragmatic trial.
Article in BMC medical research methodology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 44 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
44 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- A review of trauma and orthopaedic randomised clinical trials published in high-impact general medical journals.European journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie · 2022Pooled it
- Efficacy of Communication Bridge-2 for primary progressive aphasia: A randomized controlled trial of communication intervention.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2025Trial
- Communication Bridge-2 randomized controlled trial: Recruitment and baseline features.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2025Trial
- Findings of Sequential Pilot Trials of Aliviado Dementia Care to Inform an Embedded Pragmatic Clinical Trial.The Gerontologist · 2022Trial
- Open science in dementia care embedded pragmatic clinical trials.Psychology and aging · 2022Trial
- Implementation of a stepped wedge cluster randomized trial to evaluate a hospital mobility program.Trials · 2020Trial
- Advance Care Planning Video Intervention Among Long-Stay Nursing Home Residents: A Pragmatic Cluster Randomized Clinical Trial.JAMA internal medicine · 2020Trial
- Lessons From the Communication Bridge Trials: Advancing Meaningful Dyadic Interventions Toward Implementation.Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR · 2026Review
- The design of embedded pragmatic clinical trials: methodological developments and statistical lessons learned from the first cycle of the NIA IMPACT collaboratory.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2026Article
- Invested Partner Feedback on Technology Assistance in Dementia (Tech-AiD).Journal of applied gerontology : the official journal of the Southern Gerontological Society · 2026Article
- Using the readiness assessment for pragmatic trials (RAPT) model to structure partner engagement and strengthen pragmatic research readiness.Journal of clinical and translational science · 2026Article
- The cost of non-drug interventions that improve function and reduce dementia-related behaviors.BMC geriatrics · 2025Article
- A framework for health systems to assess and prioritize participation in pragmatic clinical trials.Learning health systems · 2025Article
- Nonpharmacological Pain Management for People With Dementia: A Scoping Review Mapping Research Gaps From a Pragmatic Lens.Journal of the American Geriatrics Society · 2025Article
- Integrating health equity into a national infrastructure to support pragmatic trials in dementia care.Journal of the American Geriatrics Society · 2024Article
- Modifications of the readiness assessment for pragmatic trials tool for appropriate use with Indigenous populations.BMC medical research methodology · 2024Article
- Selecting outcomes for pragmatic clinical trials in dementia care: The IMPACT Collaboratory iLibrary.Journal of the American Geriatrics Society · 2024Article
- Pragmatic Clinical Trials for Dementia Care: Experience from the First 5 Years of the IMPACT Collaboratory.Generations (San Francisco, Calif.) · 2024Article
- Dementia and Hearing Aid Use and Cessation: A National Study.American journal of audiology · 2023Article
- Preparing for pragmatic trials in dementia care: Health equity considerations for nonpharmacological interventions.Journal of the American Geriatrics Society · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundPragmatic randomized, controlled trials (PCTs) test the effectiveness of interventions implemented in routine clinical practice. Because PCT findings are generalizable, this approach is gaining momentum among interventionists and funding agencies seeking to accelerate the testing and adoption of evidence-based strategies to improve care and outcomes. Particular attention is being paid to non-pharmacological interventions, which are often complex and may be difficult to uniformly implement across multiple sites. While many such non-pharmacological interventions have proven efficacious in small trials, most have not been widely adopted. PCTs could accelerate effectiveness testing and adoption, yet there are no established criteria to identify interventions ready for testing in a PCT.
methodsWe convened 30 interventionists and healthcare leaders to identify criteria to assess the readiness of non-pharmacological interventions for PCTs. Based on this discussion, we created a model with multiple domains, qualitative scoring guidelines for each domain, and a graphical summary of readiness assessments. All workshop participants had an opportunity to review and comment on the resulting model; three piloted it with their own interventions. Several other experts also provided input.
resultsThe Readiness Assessment for Pragmatic Trials (RAPT) model enables interventionists to assess an intervention's readiness for PCTs. RAPT includes nine domains: implementation protocol, evidence, risk, feasibility, measurement, cost, acceptability, alignment, and impact. Domains reflect a range of considerations regarding the feasibility of successfully employing PCT methods and the prospect of an intervention's widespread adoption, if proven effective. Individuals evaluating an intervention are asked to qualitatively assess each domain from low to high readiness. In this report, we provide assessment guidelines and examples of scored interventions.
conclusionsRAPT is the first model to help interventionists and funders assess the extent to which interventions are ready for PCTs. Scoring efficacious interventions using RAPT can inform research team discussions regarding whether or not to advance an intervention to effectiveness testing using a PCT and how do design that PCTs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.