Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31319553›Full record

ReviewVaccines2019

The Humoral Immune Response Against the gB Vaccine: Lessons Learnt from Protection in Solid Organ Transplantation.

Ariane C Gomes, Paul D Griffiths, Matthew B Reeves

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Vaccines, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Multiple Sclerosis, Viruses, and New Vaccines.Neurology international · 2021
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Ariane C GomesInstitute for Immunity and Transplantation, University College London, London NW3 2PF, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-3974-4088
Paul D GriffithsInstitute for Immunity and Transplantation, University College London, London NW3 2PF, UK.
Matthew B ReevesInstitute for Immunity and Transplantation, University College London, London NW3 2PF, UK. matthew.reeves@ucl.ac.uk.

Funding

PHASE IB TRIAL OF CYTOMEGALOVIRUS GLYCOPROTEIN B VACCINER01AI051355 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY COLLEGE LONDON · PI GRIFFITHS, PAUL D · 2003 to 2008
$866k
NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI051355Wellcome Trust 204870/Z/16/ZWellcome Trust WT/204870/Z/16/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Human cytomegalovirus (hCMV) is considered to be the highest priority for vaccine development. This view is underscored by the significant morbidity associated with congenital hCMV infection and viraemia in transplant patients. Although a number of vaccines have been trialed, none have been licensed. The hCMV vaccine candidate that has performed best in clinical trials to date is the recombinant glycoprotein B (gB) vaccine that has demonstrated protection, ranging from a 43% to 50% efficacy in three independent phase II trials. In this review, we focus on data from the phase II trial performed in solid organ transplant patients and the outcomes of follow-up studies attempting to identify immunological and mechanistic correlates of protection associated with this vaccine strategy. We relate this to other vaccine studies of gB as well as other vaccine strategies to determine areas of commonality and divergence. Finally, through the review, we discuss the unique challenges and opportunities presented with vaccine studies in transplant populations with recommendations that could empower subsequent trials.

Indexed as

antibodiescytomegalovirusgBvaccine

Identifiers

PMID31319553
PMCPMC6789498

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.