ReviewMicromachines2019
The Applications of 3D Printing for Craniofacial Tissue Engineering.
Review in Micromachines, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 37 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
37 citing papers in PubMed.
- Artificial Intelligence and Digital Workflow in Craniofacial Bone Tissue Engineering: From Cone-Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT) to Personalized Bioceramic Implants.Dentistry journal · 2026Review
- Development of a Bioactive Dental Barrier Membrane Based on PCL/Collagen and PVA/Hydroxyapatite Layers with Amoxicillin-Loaded Electrosprayed Coating.Pharmaceutics · 2026Article
- Comparison of Low-Dose, Standard-Dose, and High-Definition CBCT Protocols for STL Reconstruction Accuracy in Digital Bone Scaffold Workflows.International journal of dentistry · 2026Article
- Personalized bioceramic grafts for craniomaxillofacial bone regeneration.International journal of oral science · 2024Review
- 3D Melt-Extrusion Printing of Medium Chain Length Polyhydroxyalkanoates and Their Application as Antibiotic-Free Antibacterial Scaffolds for Bone Regeneration.ACS biomaterials science & engineering · 2024Article
- Single/Multi-Network Conductive Hydrogels-A Review.Polymers · 2024Review
- Unlocking the Future: Bioprinting Salivary Glands-From Possibility to Reality.Journal of functional biomaterials · 2024Review
- Direct inkjet writing type 1 bovine collagen/β-tricalcium phosphate scaffolds for bone regeneration.Journal of biomedical materials research. Part B, Applied biomaterials · 2024Article
- Advances in biomaterials for oral-maxillofacial bone regeneration: spotlight on periodontal and alveolar bone strategies.Regenerative biomaterials · 2024Review
- Design, Preparation, and Mechanical Property Study of Polylactic Acid/Ca3D printing and additive manufacturing · 2023Article
- Advancing Dentistry through Bioprinting: Personalization of Oral Tissues.Journal of functional biomaterials · 2023Review
- Hydrogels-A Promising Materials for 3D Printing Technology.Gels (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Advanced Hydrogel systems for mandibular reconstruction.Bioactive materials · 2023Review
- Recent progress and clinical applications of advanced biomaterials in cosmetic surgery.Regenerative biomaterials · 2023Review
- Microfabrication approaches for oral research and clinical dentistry.Frontiers in dental medicine · 2023Review
- Phosphoserine enhanced Cu-doped bioactive glass dynamic dual-network hydrogel for craniofacial bone defect repair.Regenerative biomaterials · 2023Article
- Bringing hydrogel-based craniofacial therapies to the clinic.Acta biomaterialia · 2022Review
- Bioprinting of Complex Multicellular Organs with Advanced Functionality-Recent Progress and Challenges Ahead.Advanced materials (Deerfield Beach, Fla.) · 2022Review
- 3D Printing: Advancement in Biogenerative Engineering to Combat Shortage of Organs and Bioapplicable Materials.Regenerative engineering and translational medicine · 2022Review
- Anatomical Engineering and 3D Printing for Surgery and Medical Devices: International Review and Future Exponential Innovations.BioMed research international · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Three-dimensional (3D) printing is an emerging technology in the field of dentistry. It uses a layer-by-layer manufacturing technique to create scaffolds that can be used for dental tissue engineering applications. While several 3D printing methodologies exist, such as selective laser sintering or fused deposition modeling, this paper will review the applications of 3D printing for craniofacial tissue engineering; in particular for the periodontal complex, dental pulp, alveolar bone, and cartilage. For the periodontal complex, a 3D printed scaffold was attempted to treat a periodontal defect; for dental pulp, hydrogels were created that can support an odontoblastic cell line; for bone and cartilage, a polycaprolactone scaffold with microspheres induced the formation of multiphase fibrocartilaginous tissues. While the current research highlights the development and potential of 3D printing, more research is required to fully understand this technology and for its incorporation into the dental field.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.