Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31319393›Full record

ArticleJournal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network : JNCCN2019

Patterns of Surveillance Advanced Imaging and Serum Tumor Biomarker Testing Following Launch of the Choosing Wisely Initiative.

Randy C Miles, Christoph I Lee, Qin Sun, Aasthaa Bansal, Gary H Lyman, Jennifer M Specht, Catherine R Fedorenko, Mikael Anne Greenwood-Hickman, Scott D Ramsey, Janie M Lee

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network : JNCCN, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Patient and Physician Perspectives on Using Risk Prediction to Support Breast Cancer Surveillance Decision Making.Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Choosing Wisely® in Hematology: Have We Made a Difference?Current hematologic malignancy reports · 2020
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Randy C MilesDepartment of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts; and.
Christoph I LeeDepartment of Radiology, University of Washington Medical Center.
Qin SunFred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center.
Aasthaa BansalUniversity of Washington.
Gary H LymanUniversity of Washington Medical Center.
Jennifer M SpechtDepartment of Oncology, University of Washington Medical Center, and.
Catherine R FedorenkoFred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center.
Mikael Anne Greenwood-HickmanKaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute, Seattle, Washington.
Scott D RamseyUniversity of Washington Medical Center.
Janie M LeeDepartment of Radiology, University of Washington Medical Center.

Funding

Translational Bioimaging Core Shared ResourceP30CA015704 · NCI · FRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH CENTER · PI Marian Esvelt · 1985 to 2026
$296.4M
Personalized Risk-AdaptIve Surveillance strategies in cancEr -- PRAISER37CA218413 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI BANSAL, AASTHAA · 2018 to 2024
$3.0M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA015704NCI NIH HHS R37 CA218413
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe purpose of this study was to assess advanced imaging (bone scan, CT, or PET/CT) and serum tumor biomarker use in asymptomatic breast cancer survivors during the surveillance period. PATIENTS AND

methodsCancer registry records for 2,923 women diagnosed with primary breast cancer in Washington State between January 1, 2007, and December 31, 2014, were linked with claims data from 2 regional commercial insurance plans. Clinical data including demographic and tumor characteristics were collected. Evaluation and management codes from claims data were used to determine advanced imaging and serum tumor biomarker testing during the peridiagnostic and surveillance phases of care. Multivariable logistic regression models were used to identify clinical factors and patterns of peridiagnostic imaging and biomarker testing associated with surveillance advanced imaging.

resultsOf 2,923 eligible women, 16.5% (n=480) underwent surveillance advanced imaging and 31.8% (n=930) received surveillance serum tumor biomarker testing. Compared with women diagnosed before the launch of the Choosing Wisely campaign in 2012, later diagnosis was associated with lower use of surveillance advanced imaging (odds ratio [OR], 0.68; 95% CI, 0.52-0.89). Factors significantly associated with use of surveillance advanced imaging included increasing disease stage (stage III: OR, 3.65; 95% CI, 2.48-5.38), peridiagnostic advanced imaging use (OR, 1.76; 95% CI, 1.33-2.31), and peridiagnostic serum tumor biomarker testing (OR, 1.35; 95% CI, 1.01-1.80).

conclusionsAlthough use of surveillance advanced imaging in asymptomatic breast cancer survivors has declined since the launch of the Choosing Wisely campaign, frequent use of surveillance serum tumor biomarker testing remains prevalent, representing a potential target for further efforts to reduce low-value practices.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAsymptomatic DiseasesBiomarkers, TumorBreastBreast NeoplasmsCancer SurvivorsFemaleGuideline AdherenceHumansMiddle AgedPopulation SurveillancePositron-Emission TomographyBiomarkers, Tumor

Identifiers

PMID31319393
PMCPMC9311311

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.