Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31319166›Full record

ArticleNeurobiology of learning and memory2019

Sign-tracking behavior is difficult to extinguish and resistant to multiple cognitive enhancers.

Christopher J Fitzpatrick, Trevor Geary, Justin F Creeden, Jonathan D Morrow

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neurobiology of learning and memory, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 41 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Reward-Mediated, Model-Free Reinforcement-Learning Mechanisms in Pavlovian and Instrumental Tasks Are Related.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2023
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Christopher J FitzpatrickNeuroscience Graduate Program, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Trevor GearyDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Justin F CreedenDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Jonathan D MorrowNeuroscience Graduate Program, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA; Department of Psychiatry, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA. Electronic address: jonmorro@med.umich.edu.
University of Michigan–Ann Arbor · US

Funding

NIDA Training Program in Neuroscience-Administrative SupplementT32DA007281 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI Shelly Beth Flagel · 1995 to 2026
$5.7M
Individual Differences in Epigenetic Regulation of Emotional LearningR01DA044960 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI MORROW, JONATHAN DAVID · 2018 to 2022
$2.3M
Neural Circuitry of Shared Vulnerability to Both PTSD and AddictionK08DA037912 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI MORROW, JONATHAN DAVID · 2014 to 2018
$940k
NIDA NIH HHS K08 DA037912NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA044960NIDA NIH HHS T32 DA007281
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The attribution of incentive-motivational value to drug-related cues underlies relapse and craving in drug addiction. One method of addiction treatment, cue-exposure therapy, utilizes repeated presentations of drug-related cues in the absence of drug (i.e., extinction learning); however, its efficacy has been limited due to an incomplete understanding of extinction and relapse processes after cues have been imbued with incentive-motivational value. To investigate this, we used a Pavlovian conditioned approach procedure to screen for rats that attribute incentive-motivational value to reward-related cues (sign-trackers; STs) or those that do not (goal-trackers; GTs). In Experiment 1, rats underwent Pavlovian extinction followed by reinstatement and spontaneous recovery tests. For comparison, a separate group of rats underwent PCA training followed by operant conditioning, extinction, and tests of reinstatement and spontaneous recovery. In Experiment 2, three cognitive enhancers (sodium butyrate, D-cycloserine, and fibroblast growth factor 2) were administered following extinction training to facilitate extinction learning. STs but not GTs displayed enduring resistance to Pavlovian, but not operant, extinction and were more susceptible to spontaneous recovery. In addition, none of the cognitive enhancers tested affected extinction learning. These results expand our understanding of extinction learning by demonstrating that there is individual variation in extinction and relapse processes and highlight potential difficulties in applying extinction-based therapies to drug addiction treatment in the clinic.

Indexed as

Conditioning, ClassicalCuesAnimalsButyric AcidConditioning, OperantCycloserineDrug-Seeking BehaviorExtinction, PsychologicalFibroblast Growth Factor 2MaleMotivationNootropic AgentsRatsRats, Sprague-DawleyButyric AcidCycloserineFibroblast Growth Factor 2Nootropic AgentsAutoshapingExtinctionLearningPavlovian conditioned approachReinforcementReinstatement

Identifiers

PMID31319166
PMCPMC6773616
OpenAlexW2956464896

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.