ArticleMedical physics2019
Automatic large quantity landmark pairs detection in 4DCT lung images.
Article in Medical physics, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.
- A vessel bifurcation landmark pair dataset for abdominal CT deformable image registration (DIR) validation.Medical physics · 2025Article
- Artificial intelligence in four-dimensional imaging for motion management in radiation therapy.Artificial intelligence review · 2025Article
- A vessel bifurcation liver CT landmark pair dataset for evaluating deformable image registration algorithms.Medical physics · 2025Article
- A comprehensive lung CT landmark pair dataset for evaluating deformable image registration algorithms.Medical physics · 2024Article
- Deformable lung 4DCT image registration via landmark-driven cycle network.Medical physics · 2024Article
- Combined Mass Spectrometry and Histopathology Imaging for Perioperative Tissue Assessment in Cancer Surgery.Journal of imaging · 2021Article
- Detection of vessel bifurcations in CT scans for automatic objective assessment of deformable image registration accuracy.Medical physics · 2021Article
- GroupRegNet: a groupwise one-shot deep learning-based 4D image registration method.Physics in medicine and biology · 2021Article
- Deep learning in medical image registration: a review.Physics in medicine and biology · 2020Review
- LungRegNet: An unsupervised deformable image registration method for 4D-CT lung.Medical physics · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
purposeTo automatically and precisely detect a large quantity of landmark pairs between two lung computed tomography (CT) images to support evaluation of deformable image registration (DIR). We expect that the generated landmark pairs will significantly augment the current lung CT benchmark datasets in both quantity and positional accuracy.
methodsA large number of landmark pairs were detected within the lung between the end-exhalation (EE) and end-inhalation (EI) phases of the lung four-dimensional computed tomography (4DCT) datasets. Thousands of landmarks were detected by applying the Harris-Stephens corner detection algorithm on the probability maps of the lung vasculature tree. A parametric image registration method (pTVreg) was used to establish initial landmark correspondence by registering the images at EE and EI phases. A multi-stream pseudo-siamese (MSPS) network was then developed to further improve the landmark pair positional accuracy by directly predicting three-dimensional (3D) shifts to optimally align the landmarks in EE to their counterparts in EI. Positional accuracies of the detected landmark pairs were evaluated using both digital phantoms and publicly available landmark pairs.
resultsDense sets of landmark pairs were detected for 10 4DCT lung datasets, with an average of 1886 landmark pairs per case. The mean and standard deviation of target registration error (TRE) were 0.47 ± 0.45 mm with 98% of landmark pairs having a TRE smaller than 2 mm for 10 digital phantom cases. Tests using 300 manually labeled landmark pairs in 10 lung 4DCT benchmark datasets (DIRLAB) produced TRE results of 0.73 ± 0.53 mm with 97% of landmark pairs having a TRE smaller than 2 mm.
conclusionA new method was developed to automatically and precisely detect a large quantity of landmark pairs between lung CT image pairs. The detected landmark pairs could be used as benchmark datasets for more accurate and informative quantitative evaluation of DIR algorithms.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.