Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31318946›Full record

ArticlePloS one2019

Fecal microbiota of different reproductive stages of the central population of the lesser-long nosed bat, Leptonycteris yerbabuenae.

Osiris Gaona, Elizabeth Selene Gómez-Acata, Daniel Cerqueda-García, Carla Ximena Neri-Barrios, Luisa I Falcón

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. The microbiome of bat guano: for what is this knowledge important?Applied microbiology and biotechnology · 2021
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Gut microbiota and healthy longevity.Science China. Life sciences · 2024
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Osiris GaonaPosgrado en Ciencias Biológicas, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Instituto de Ecología, UNAM, Mexico City, México.ORCID 0000-0002-2131-9884
Elizabeth Selene Gómez-AcataLaboratorio de Ecología Bacteriana, Instituto de Ecología, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, UNAM, Parque Científico y Tecnológico de Yucatán, Mérida, Yucatán, México.ORCID 0000-0003-0738-0483
Daniel Cerqueda-GarcíaConsorcio de Investigación del Golfo de México (CIGOM), Centro de Investigación y de Estudios Avanzados del Instituto Politécnico Nacional, Unidad Mérida, Departamento de Recursos del Mar, Mérida, Yucatán, México.
Carla Ximena Neri-BarriosLaboratorio de Ecología Bacteriana, Instituto de Ecología, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, UNAM, Parque Científico y Tecnológico de Yucatán, Mérida, Yucatán, México.
Luisa I FalcónLaboratorio de Ecología Bacteriana, Instituto de Ecología, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, UNAM, Parque Científico y Tecnológico de Yucatán, Mérida, Yucatán, México.
Instituto de Ecología · MXInstituto Politécnico Nacional · MX

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In this study we analyzed the microbiota composition of fecal samples from the lesser-long nosed bat Leptonycteris yerbabuenae in different reproductive stages (juveniles and adult bats of both sexes as well as pregnant and lactating females). The V4 region of the 16s rRNA gene from 33 individuals was analyzed using alpha and beta diversity metrics. We found that microbiota diversity (expressed in Amplicon Sequence Variants) is higher in pregnant and lactating females. The microbiota of the juveniles and non-reproductive adults was dominated by Gammaproteobacteria and Firmicutes. Reproductive females had a much more diverse microbiota, with a significant increase in phyla such as Bacteroidetes and Alphaproteobacteria. There was no difference in fecal microbiota diversity between pregnant and lactating females and juveniles and non-reproductive adults. Results suggest that differences in microbiota diversity are related to reproduction. We infer that males maintain stable microbiota composition because they do not undergo the large physiological changes that females do during reproduction and maintain a more specialized diet throughout all life stages.

Indexed as

Gastrointestinal MicrobiomeReproductionAnimalsChiropteraFecesFemaleGeographyMaleMetagenomeMetagenomicsPregnancyRNA, Ribosomal, 16SRNA, Ribosomal, 16S

Identifiers

PMID31318946
PMCPMC6639036
OpenAlexW2959822804

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.