ArticlePloS one2019
Quantitative evaluation of tissue stiffness around lesion by sound touch elastography in the diagnosis of benign and malignant breast lesions.
Article in PloS one, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed.
- Effect of Hydrogel Stiffness on Chemoresistance of Breast Cancer Cells in 3D Culture.Gels (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- VisR Ultrasound With Non-Normal ARF-AoS Incidence Interrogates Both Shear and Young's Elastic Moduli in Transversely Isotropic Materials.IEEE open journal of ultrasonics, ferroelectrics, and frequency control · 2024Article
- Sound touch elastography of Achilles tendons in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus versus healthy adults.Diabetology & metabolic syndrome · 2023Article
- Cine MR feature tracking analysis for diagnosing thymic epithelial tumors: a feasibility study.Cancer imaging : the official publication of the International Cancer Imaging Society · 2023Article
- Development and validation of a nomogram for discriminating between benign and malignant breast masses by conventional ultrasound and dual-mode elastography: a multicenter study.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2023Article
- Article
- Diagnostic efficacy of ultrasound elastography and dynamic contrast-enhanced MR in benign and malignant breast masses.American journal of translational research · 2023Article
- The Extracellular Matrix Stiffening: A Trigger of Prostate Cancer Progression and Castration Resistance?Cancers · 2022Review
- Cell and Tissue Nanomechanics: From Early Development to Carcinogenesis.Biomedicines · 2022Review
- Review
- Role of "Stiff Rim" sign obtained by shear wave elastography in diagnosis and guiding therapy of breast cancer.International journal of medical sciences · 2021Article
- Evaluation of internal and shell stiffness in the differential diagnosis of breast non-mass lesions by shear wave elastography.World journal of clinical cases · 2020Article
- The Mechanical Microenvironment in Breast Cancer.Cancers · 2020Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The purpose of our study is to assess the diagnostic performance of quantitative evaluation of tissue stiffness around lesion by Sound Touch Elastography (STE) in distinguishing between benign and malignant breast lesions. A total number of 160 breast lesions from 160 female patients were examined by STE. Resona 7 was equipped with "shell" function to measure elastic modulus values of tissue in the region of surrounding lesion quantitatively. The contours of the lesion were required to be delineated. The elastic modulus values of tissue in the region of 1mm, 2mm, and 3mm outside the boundary were acquired. The elastic modulus values included maximum elastic modulus (Emax), mean elastic modulus (Emean), minimum elastic modulus (Emin), and elastic modulus standard deviation (Esd). All lesions were confirmed by histopathology. We compared the differences of the above elastic modulus values between benign and malignant groups. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was drawn with the histological diagnostic results as the gold standard. Sensitivity and specificity were calculated to evaluate the diagnostic performance of STE. Operator consistency was also analyzed. Among the 160 lesions, 100 (62.5%) were benign and 60 (37.5%) were malignant. In the region of 1mm, 2mm, and 3mm surrounding the lesion, Emax, Emean, and Esd of malignant group were significantly higher than those of the benign group (all P<0.05). When the "shell" was 3mm, Emax had the highest AUROC value (AUROC = 0.998). Regarding the measurement of elastic modulus values, all the intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC) values of the inter-operator consistency were greater than 0.75 for Emax, Emean, and Esd. Therefore, quantitative evaluation of tissue stiffness around lesion by STE has the potential to distinguish between benign and malignant breast lesions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.