Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31318463›Full record

ArticleHistopathology2019

Histological grading in primary membranous nephropathy is essential for clinical management and predicts outcome of patients.

Maria J Stangou, Smaragdi Marinaki, Evangelos Papachristou, George Liapis, Panagiotis Pateinakis, Hara Gakiopoulou, Christina Nikolaidou, Kyriaki Kolovou, Ioanna-Theologia Lampropoulou, Synodi Zerbala and 33 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Histopathology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 35 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Kidney diseases.Immunological reviews · 2023
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

43 authors at 20 institutions in 1 country.

Maria J StangouHippokration General Hospital, Aristotle University, Thessaloniki, Greece.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2496-9863
Smaragdi MarinakiNational and Kapodistrian University, Laiko General Hospital, Athens, Greece.
Evangelos PapachristouUniversity Hospital of Patras, Patras, Greece.
George LiapisNational and Kapodistrian University, Laiko General Hospital, Athens, Greece.
Panagiotis PateinakisPapageorgiou General Hospital of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2982-6426
Hara GakiopoulouNational and Kapodistrian University, Laiko General Hospital, Athens, Greece.
Christina NikolaidouHippokration General Hospital, Aristotle University, Thessaloniki, Greece.
Kyriaki KolovouNational and Kapodistrian University, Laiko General Hospital, Athens, Greece.
Ioanna-Theologia LampropoulouHippokration General Hospital, Aristotle University, Thessaloniki, Greece.
Synodi ZerbalaGeneral Hospital of Nikaia, Piraeus, Greece.
Panagiota PapadeaGeneral Hospital of Nikaia, Piraeus, Greece.
Evangelia DounousiUniversity Hospital of Ioannina, Ioannina, Greece.
Olga BalafaUniversity Hospital of Ioannina, Ioannina, Greece.
Paraskevi PavlakouUniversity Hospital of Ioannina, Ioannina, Greece.
Aimilios AndrikosHatzikosta General Hospital of Ioannina, Ioannina, Greece.
Eufemia BalassiHatzikosta General Hospital of Ioannina, Ioannina, Greece.
Panagiota ManolakakiHatzikosta General Hospital of Ioannina, Ioannina, Greece.
George MoustakasGennimatas General Hospital of Athens, Athens, Greece.
Dimitra GalitsiouGennimatas General Hospital of Athens, Athens, Greece.
Efstathios MitsopoulosPapageorgiou General Hospital of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece.
Christina VourlakouEvaggelismos General Hospital, Athens, Greece.
Vasiliki ChoulitoudiEvaggelismos General Hospital, Athens, Greece.
Paraskevi-Evi AndronikidiEvaggelismos General Hospital, Athens, Greece.
Ioannis StefanidisUniversity Hospital of Larissa, Larissa, Greece.
Spyridon GolfinopoulosUniversity Hospital of Larissa, Larissa, Greece.
Eugene DafnisUniversity Hospital of Heraklion, Heraklion, Crete, Greece.
Kostas StylianouUniversity Hospital of Heraklion, Heraklion, Crete, Greece.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3678-9421
Stylianos PanagoutsosUniversity Hospital of Alexandroupolis, Alexandroupoli, Greece.
Apostolos PapadogianakisVenizelio General Hospital of Heraklion, Heraklion, Crete, Greece.
Ioannis TzanakisGeneral Hospital of Chania, Chania, Crete, Greece.
Athanasios SioulisAHEPA University General Hospital, Thessaloniki, Greece.
Demetrios VlahakosAttikon University Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University, Athens, Greece.
Irene GrapsaAretaieio Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece.
Maria TsilivigkouTzaneion General Hospital of Piraeus, Athens, Greece.
Nikolaos KaperonisHellenic Red Cross Hospital Korgialeneio-Benakeio, Athens, Greece.
Christos PaliourasGeneral Hospital of Rhodes, Rhodes, Greece.
Christos DioudisGeneral Hospital of Drama, Drama, Greece.
Sophia SpaiaGeneral Hospital of Thessaloniki 'Agios Pavlos', Thessaloniki, Greece.
Theofanis ApostolouVenizelio General Hospital of Heraklion, Heraklion, Crete, Greece.
Christos IatrouGeneral Hospital of Nikaia, Piraeus, Greece.
John BoletisNational and Kapodistrian University, Laiko General Hospital, Athens, Greece.
Dimitrios GoumenosUniversity Hospital of Patras, Patras, Greece.
Aikaterini PapagianniHippokration General Hospital, Aristotle University, Thessaloniki, Greece.
Laiko General Hospital of Athens · GRAgios Pavlos General Hospital · GRHippocration General Hospital · GRGeneral Hospital of Ioannina G. Hatzikosta · GRGeneral Hospital of Nikea · GRUniversity Hospital of Ioannina · GRGeneral Hospital of Athens G. Genimatas · GRGeneral University Hospital of Patras · GRNational and Kapodistrian University of Athens · GRPapageorgiou General Hospital · GRThe General Hospital of Heraklion "Venizeleio-Pananio" · GRUniversity Hospital of Heraklion · GRUniversity Hospital of Larissa · GRAHEPA University Hospital · GRChania General Hospital ”St. George” · GRGeneral Hospital of Drama · GRGeneral Hospital of Rhodes · GRHellenic Red Cross · GRTzaneion General Hospital · GRUniversity Hospital of Alexandroupolis · GR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimsDiagnosis of primary membranous nephropathy (PMN) is mainly based on immunofluorescence/immunohistochemistry findings. However, assessment of specific features on optical microscopy can help to estimate the severity of the disease, guide treatment and predict the response. The aim of this study was to identify, classify and grade the precise histological findings in PMN to predict renal function outcome and guide treatment. METHODS AND

resultsHistological parameters, including focal segmental sclerosis (FSGS), tubular atrophy (TA), interstitial fibrosis (IF) and vascular hyalinosis (VH), were re-evaluated in 752 patients with PMN. Their predictive value was estimated separately, and also in a combination score (FSTIV) graded from 0 to 4. Finally, the impact of histology was assessed in the response to immunosuppressive treatment. Mean age of patients was 53.3 (15-85) years and most presented with nephrotic syndrome. FSGS was present in 32% and VH in 51% of the patients, while TA and IF were graded as stage ≥1 in 52% and 51.4%, respectively. The follow-up period was 122.3 (112-376) months. FSGS, TA and IF and VH were associated with impaired renal function at diagnosis (P = 0.02, P < 0.0001, P = 0.001 and P = 0.02, respectively) and at the end of follow-up (P = 0.004, P < 0.0001, P < 0.0001 and P = 0.04, respectively). In multiple regression and binary logistic analysis, the presence of FSGS and degree of TA were the most significant parameters predicting renal function outcome, defined either by eGFR (end), FSGS (r = 0.6, P < 0.0001) and TA (r = 0.6, P < 0.0001), or by the endpoint of >50% eGFR reduction, FSGS (P = 0.001) and TA (P = 0.02). Also, patients presented with FSGS, IF, VH and/or with FSTIV > 1 could benefit from immunosuppression, regardless of clinical presentation.

conclusionsThe presence and degree of four histological indices, FSGS, VH, TA and IF, assessed separately or in combination, and FSTIV score not only predict renal function outcome after long-term follow-up, but can also help in the choice of appropriate treatment. Decisions concerning immunosuppressive treatment can be guided by pathology regardless of clinical findings.

Indexed as

Glomerulonephritis, MembranousAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overBiopsyFemaleHistocytochemistryHumansImmunosuppressive AgentsKidneyKidney DiseasesMaleMiddle AgedPrognosisRetrospective StudiesImmunosuppressive Agentsfocal sclerosisinterstitial fibrosisoutcomeprimary membranous nephropathytubular atrophyvascular hyalinosis

Identifiers

PMID31318463
PMCPMC6856983
OpenAlexW2963499252

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.