Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31318225›Full record

Trial reportPsychology of addictive behaviors : journal of the Society of Psychologists in Addictive Behaviors2020

Individualized assessment and treatment program (IATP) for cannabis use disorder: Randomized controlled trial with and without contingency management.

Mark D Litt, Ronald M Kadden, Howard Tennen, Nancy M Petry

Open access · hybridAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Psychology of addictive behaviors : journal of the Society of Psychologists in Addictive Behaviors, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Mark D LittDivision of Behavioral Sciences and Community Health, UConn Health.
Ronald M KaddenDepartment of Psychiatry, UConn Health.
Howard TennenDepartment of Community Medicine and Health Care, UConn Health.
Nancy M PetryCalhoun Cardiology Center, UConn Health.
Cares Community Health · USCommunity Health Center · USUniversidad Cristiana Autónoma de Nicaragua · NI

Funding

ZONISAMIDE VERSUS PLACEBOM01RR006192 · NCRR · UNIVERSITY OF CONNECTICUT SCH OF MED/DNT · PI LAURENCIN, CATO T. · 1994 to 2008
$22.1M
Individualized Assessment and Treatment for Marijuana Dependence: Treatment MechaR01DA012728 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF CONNECTICUT SCH OF MED/DNT · PI LITT, MARK D. · 2000 to 2017
$7.1M
Individualized Assessment and Treatment Program for Alcoholism: Treatment and MechanismsR01AA024729 · NIAAA · UNIVERSITY OF CONNECTICUT SCH OF MED/DNT · PI LITT, MARK D. · 2016 to 2020
$3.0M
NCRR NIH HHS M01 RR006192NIAAA NIH HHS R01 AA024729NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA012728NIH HHS
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study tested a new approach to the treatment of cannabis use disorder (CUD). CUD is difficult to treat, and achieving abstinence is particularly difficult. The individualized assessment and treatment program (IATP) was intended to address this problem by providing a highly individualized approach to the training of coping skills most relevant for each individual. To do this, an experience sampling procedure was used prior to treatment to record patients' marijuana use behavior and associated thoughts, feelings, coping behaviors, and situations. This information was used by therapists to plan treatment that would address the specific strengths and weaknesses of each patient in drug-use situations. The present study tested IATP against a conventional combined motivational enhancement cognitive-behavioral treatment (MET-CBT), with or without the addition of contingency management (CM) for abstinence. The patients were 198 men and women randomly assigned to 1 of 4 nine-session treatment conditions: MET-CBT, MET-CBT-CM, IATP, or IATP-CM. Patients were assessed out to 14 months. Planned contrasts indicated that the IATP conditions yielded greater levels of abstinence than did the MET-CBT conditions. The addition of CM did not bolster the performance of IATP but did do so for MET-CBT. As expected, IATP lead to greater use of coping skills than did the MET-CBT conditions. However, coping skills use was not a significant predictor of outcome when other variables were in the same analyses. Self-efficacy was a robust predictor and mediator of outcome. We suggest that the IATP may act by enhancing self-efficacy. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2020 APA, all rights reserved).

Indexed as

Adaptation, PsychologicalCognitive Behavioral TherapyMotivationSelf EfficacyAdultEcological Momentary AssessmentFemaleHumansMaleMarijuana AbuseMiddle AgedTreatment OutcomeYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID31318225
PMCPMC6980271
OpenAlexW2962870361

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.