Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31318176›Full record

ArticleJournal of the International AIDS Society2019

Global access of rifabutin for the treatment of tuberculosis - why should we prioritize this?

Neesha Rockwood, Maddalena Cerrone, Melissa Barber, Andrew M Hill, Anton L Pozniak

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the International AIDS Society, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Development and hepatotoxicity of rifamycin derivatives.Expert opinion on drug metabolism & toxicology · 2025
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Observational
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Effects of a NanoencapsulatedAntioxidants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Article
  18. Article
  19. DisputedAntimicrobial agents and chemotherapy · 2021
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Neesha RockwoodDepartment of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-7830-1394
Maddalena CerroneDepartment of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Melissa BarberDepartment of Global Health and Population, Harvard TH Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA.
Andrew M HillDepartment of Pharmacology and Therapeutics, Liverpool University, Liverpool, UK.
Anton L PozniakDepartment of HIV Medicine, Chelsea and Westminster Hospital, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-4091-5323
Chelsea and Westminster Hospital · GBHarvard Global Health Institute · USUniversity of Liverpool · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionRifabutin, a rifamycin of equivalent potency to rifampicin, has several advantages in its pharmacokinetic and toxicity profile, particularly in HIV co-infected patients on combined antiretroviral therapy (cART). In this commentary, we evaluate evidence supporting increased global use of rifabutin and highlight key recommendations for action. DISCUSSION: Although extrapolation of data from HIV uninfected patients would suggest non-inferiority, there has been no randomized controlled study comparing rifabutin versus rifampicin in the outcomes of relapse-free cure, in drug susceptible tuberculosis (TB), in HIV co-infected patients on currently utilized cART regimens or in paediatric populations. An important advantage of rifabutin is that compared to the dose adjustments required with rifampicin, it can be co-administered with the integrase strand transfer inhibitors raltegravir or dolutegravir without the need for dose adjustments. This strategy would be easier to implement in a programmatic setting and would save costs. We have assessed cost incentives to utilize rifabutin and have estimated generic costs for a range of rifabutin dosage scenarios. Where facilities are present for drug re-challenge and monitoring for drug toxicity and cross-reactivity, rifabutin offers a switch alternative for adverse drug reactions (ADR)s attributed to rifampicin. This would negate the need to prolong treatment in the absence of a rifamycin as part of short-course multidrug therapy. There is evidence of incomplete cross-resistance to rifampicin and rifabutin. Rifabutin may be useful in rifampicin-resistant TB, in an estimated 20% of cases, based on phenotypic or genotypic rifabutin susceptibility testing.

conclusionsRifabutin should be available globally as a first-line rifamycin in HIV co-infected individuals and as a switch option in cases of rifampicin associated ADRs. Further studies are needed to ascertain the utility of rifabutin in rifampicin-resistant rifabutin-susceptible TB.

Indexed as

AdultAntibiotics, AntitubercularAntitubercular AgentsCoinfectionDrug Therapy, CombinationFemaleGlobal HealthHIV-1HIV InfectionsHumansMaleRifabutinTuberculosisAntibiotics, AntitubercularAntitubercular AgentsRifabutinantiretroviral therapycost effectivenessdrug-resistant-TBHIVpharmacokinetic interactionsRifabutinswitchtoxicitytreatment outcomestuberculosis

Identifiers

PMID31318176
PMCPMC6637439
OpenAlexW2958974345

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.