Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31317511›Full record

Trial reportApplied health economics and health policy2019

Using Adherence-Contingent Rebates on Chronic Disease Treatment Costs to Promote Medication Adherence: Results from a Randomized Controlled Trial.

Marcel Bilger, Tina T Wong, Jia Yi Lee, Kaye L Howard, Filipinas G Bundoc, Ecosse L Lamoureux, Eric A Finkelstein

Registry-linked trialAbstract readRandomized Controlled TrialEquivalence Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Applied health economics and health policy, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02271269 (A Randomized Controlled Trial to Increase Glaucoma Medication Adherence Using Value Pricing), which is not on this map. Cited by 12 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02271269 nacompletednot on this map

A Randomized Controlled Trial to Increase Glaucoma Medication Adherence Using Value Pricing

TypeinterventionalSponsorDuke-NUS Graduate Medical SchoolRan2014 to 2017Enrolled100ConditionsGlaucomaArmsValue Pricing Subsidies
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Behavioral Economics and Tobacco Control: Current Practices and Future Opportunities.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Marcel BilgerHealth Economics and Policy, Vienna University of Business and Economics, Welthandelsplatz 1, Building D4, 1020, Vienna, Austria. marcel.bilger@wu.ac.at.ORCID 0000-0002-2872-6597
Tina T WongSingapore National Eye Centre, Singapore Eye Research Institute, Singapore, Singapore.
Jia Yi LeeSingapore National Eye Centre, Singapore Eye Research Institute, Singapore, Singapore.
Kaye L HowardHealth Services & Systems Research Program, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore, Singapore.
Filipinas G BundocHealth Services & Systems Research Program, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore, Singapore.
Ecosse L LamoureuxHealth Services & Systems Research Program, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore, Singapore.
Eric A FinkelsteinHealth Services & Systems Research Program, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore, Singapore.

Funding

Ministry of Health, Singapore NMRC/HSRNIG/0006/2014
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPoor adherence to medications is a global public health concern with substantial health and cost implications, especially for chronic conditions. In the USA, poor adherence is estimated to cause 125,000 deaths and cost $US100 billion annually. The most successful adherence-promoting strategies that have been identified so far have moderate effect, are relatively costly, and raise availability, feasibility, and/or scalability issues.

objectiveThe main objective of SIGMA (Study on Incentives for Glaucoma Medication Adherence) was to measure the effectiveness on medication adherence of a novel incentive strategy based on behavioral economics that we refer to as adherence-contingent rebates. These rebates offered patients a near-term benefit while leveraging loss aversion and regret and increasing the salience of adherence.

methodsSIGMA is a 6-month randomized, controlled, open-label, single-center superiority trial with two parallel arms. A total of 100 non-adherent glaucoma patients from the Singapore National Eye Centre were randomized into intervention (adherence-contingent rebates) and usual care (no rebates) arms in a 1:1 ratio. The primary outcome was the mean change from baseline in percentage of adherent days at Month 6. The trial registration number is NCT02271269 and a detailed study protocol has been published elsewhere.

findingsWe found that participants who were offered adherence-contingent rebates were adherent to all their medications on 73.1% of the days after 6 months, which is 12.2 percentage points (p = 0.027) higher than in those not receiving the rebates after controlling for baseline differences. This better behavioral outcome was achieved by rebates averaging 8.07 Singapore dollars ($US5.94 as of 2 November 2017) per month during the intervention period.

conclusionThis study shows that simultaneously leveraging several insights from behavioral economics can significantly improve medication adherence rates. The relatively low cost of the rebates and significant health and cost implications of medication non-adherence suggest that this strategy has the potential to cost-effectively improve health outcomes for many conditions.

Indexed as

Medication AdherenceReimbursement, IncentiveAdultAgedAged, 80 and overChronic DiseaseDrug TherapyFemaleGlaucomaHumansMaleMiddle AgedYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID31317511
PMCPMC6885505

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.