Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31317328›Full record

ArticleJournal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology2021

Assessment of myocardial viability with [

Maria Grönman, Miikka Tarkia, Christoffer Stark, Tommi Vähäsilta, Tuomas Kiviniemi, Mark Lubberink, Paavo Halonen, Antti Kuivanen, Virva Saunavaara, Tuula Tolvanen and 8 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2023
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. A retrospective evaluation of Bayesian-penalized likelihood reconstruction for [Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2023
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Influence of image reconstruction on quantitative cardiacJournal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2023
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Assessment of myocardial viability using a [Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2021
    Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors.

Maria GrönmanTurku PET Centre, University of Turku, Turku, Finland.
Miikka TarkiaTurku PET Centre, University of Turku, Turku, Finland.
Christoffer StarkResearch Centre of Applied and Preventive Cardiovascular Medicine, University of Turku, Turku, Finland.
Tommi VähäsiltaResearch Centre of Applied and Preventive Cardiovascular Medicine, University of Turku, Turku, Finland.
Tuomas KiviniemiHeart Center, Turku University Hospital and University of Turku, Turku, Finland.
Mark LubberinkDepartment of Surgical Sciences, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.
Paavo HalonenA.I. Virtanen Institute for Molecular Sciences, University of Eastern Finland, Kuopio, Finland.
Antti KuivanenA.I. Virtanen Institute for Molecular Sciences, University of Eastern Finland, Kuopio, Finland.
Virva SaunavaaraTurku PET Centre, Turku University Hospital, Turku, Finland.
Tuula TolvanenTurku PET Centre, Turku University Hospital, Turku, Finland.
Jarmo TeuhoTurku PET Centre, University of Turku, Turku, Finland.
Mika TeräsTurku PET Centre, Turku University Hospital, Turku, Finland.
Timo SavunenResearch Centre of Applied and Preventive Cardiovascular Medicine, University of Turku, Turku, Finland.
Mikko PietiläHeart Center, Turku University Hospital and University of Turku, Turku, Finland.
Seppo Ylä-HerttualaA.I. Virtanen Institute for Molecular Sciences, University of Eastern Finland, Kuopio, Finland.
Anne RoivainenTurku PET Centre, University of Turku, Turku, Finland.
Juhani KnuutiTurku PET Centre, University of Turku, Turku, Finland.
Antti SarasteTurku PET Centre, University of Turku, Turku, Finland. antti.saraste@utu.fi.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAssessment of myocardial viability is often needed in patients with chest pain and reduced ejection fraction. We evaluated the performance of reduced resting MBF, perfusable tissue fraction (PTF), and perfusable tissue index (PTI) in the assessment of myocardial viability in a pig model of myocardial infarction (MI). METHODS AND

resultsPigs underwent resting [

conclusionsOur results indicate that resting MBF, PTF, and PTI based on [

Indexed as

Positron-Emission TomographyAnimalsCoronary CirculationDisease Models, AnimalMyocardial InfarctionOxygen RadioisotopesPredictive Value of TestsROC CurveSwineTissue SurvivalOxygen Radioisotopesmyocardial infarctionmyocardial perfusion imagingPETRadiowaterviability

Identifiers

PMID31317328
PMCPMC8421281

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.